Short-term use of an exposed polypropylene barrier in the preservation of alveolar bone after extraction: randomized clinical trial

被引:1
|
作者
dos Santos, C. C., V [1 ]
Tonini, K. R. [1 ]
Silva, M. A. A. [1 ]
de Carvalho, P. S. P. [2 ]
Ponzoni, D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Diag & Surg, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Rua Jose Bonifacio 1193, BR-16015050 Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
alveolar bone loss; bone resorption; tooth extraction; polypropylene; membranes; TOOTH EXTRACTION; RIDGE PRESERVATION; DIMENSIONAL CHANGES; PLACEMENT; DEFECTS; SOCKETS; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijom.2021.02.005
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This study was performed to evaluate the short-term preservation of alveolar bone volume with or without a polypropylene barrier and exposure of the area after extractions. Thirty posterior tooth extraction sockets were distributed randomly to a control group (n = 15; extraction and suture) and a barrier group (n = 15; extraction, barrier, and suture). All sutures and barriers were removed 10 days postoperatively. Cone beam computed tomography scans taken with the aid of a tomographic guide were obtained preoperatively, immediately postoperative, and at 120 days postoperative. A visual analysis of the coronal sections of the alveolus was performed, and vertical loss in the mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual bone ridges and horizontal thickness were evaluated. The mean vertical loss after extraction did not differ significantly between the control and barrier groups (Student t-test: mesial P = 0.989, buccal P = 0.997, lingual/palatal P = 0.070, distal P = 0.107). The mean vertical loss at 120 days postoperative did not differ significantly between the control (0.65 mm) and barrier (0.52 mm) groups (P > 0.05), with an effect size of 0.13 mm. At 120 days, the barrier group presented a mean resorption in thickness (0.45 mm) that was significantly lower than that in the control group (0.76 mm) (P = 0.021), with an effect size of 0.31 mm. The polypropylene barrier reduced the horizontal resorption in sockets of posterior teeth after extraction.
引用
收藏
页码:1259 / 1266
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomized, controlled, multicentre clinical trial of post-extraction alveolar ridge preservation
    Scheyer, Eric Todd
    Heard, Rick
    Janakievski, Jim
    Mandelaris, George
    Nevins, Marc L.
    Pickering, Stephen R.
    Richardson, Christopher R.
    Pope, Bryan
    Toback, Gregory
    Velasquez, Diego
    Nagursky, Heiner
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2016, 43 (12) : 1188 - 1199
  • [2] Effect of Healing Time on New Bone Formation After Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation With Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Whetman, Jeremiah
    Mealey, Brian L.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2016, 87 (09) : 1022 - 1029
  • [3] Primary flap closure in alveolar ridge preservation for periodontally damaged extraction socket: A randomized clinical trial
    Seo, Gil-Jong
    Lim, Hyun-Chang
    Chang, Dong-Wook
    Hong, Ji-Youn
    Shin, Seung-Il
    Kim, Gyutae
    Shin, Seung-Yun
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2023, 25 (02) : 241 - 251
  • [4] Alveolar ridge preservation using an open membrane approach for sockets with bone deficiency: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Sun, Dong-Joo
    Lim, Hyun-Chang
    Lee, Dong-Woon
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (01) : 175 - 182
  • [5] Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Sapata, Vitor M.
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Wu, Hui
    Hu, Xiu-lian
    Lin, Ye
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (05) : 522 - 529
  • [6] Histologic Healing Following Tooth Extraction With Ridge Preservation Using Mineralized Versus Combined Mineralized-Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Borg, Tyler D.
    Mealey, Brian L.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2015, 86 (03) : 348 - 355
  • [7] Comparison between two bone substitutes for alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: Cone-beam computed tomography results of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
    Llanos, Alexandre Hugo
    Sapata, Vitor Marques
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Hammerle, Christoph H.
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Cesar Neto, Joao Batista
    Pannuti, Claudio Mendes
    Romito, Giuseppe Alexandre
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2019, 46 (03) : 373 - 381
  • [8] Dimensional Changes of the Soft Tissue after Alveolar Ridge Preservation with a Collagen Material. A Clinical Randomized Trial
    Schnutenhaus, Sigmar
    Martin, Thomas
    Dreyhaupt, Jens
    Rudolph, Heike
    Luthardt, Ralph G.
    OPEN DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2018, 12 : 389 - 399
  • [9] Wound healing after ridge preservation: A randomized controlled trial on short-term (4 months) versus long-term (12 months) histologic outcomes
    Zellner, Jacob W.
    Allen, Hunter T.
    Kotsakis, Georgios A.
    Mealey, Brian L.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2023, 94 (05) : 622 - 629
  • [10] Influence of healing time on the outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation using a collagenated bovine bone xenograft: A randomized clinical trial
    Couso-Queiruga, Emilio
    Weber, Holly A.
    Garaicoa-Pazmino, Carlos
    Barwacz, Christopher
    Kalleme, Marisa
    Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
    Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2023, 50 (02) : 132 - 146