Memory T cells have gene expression patterns intermediate between naive and effector

被引:55
作者
Holmes, S
He, M
Xu, T
Lee, PP
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Stat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
CD8(+) T cells; phylogeny; microarray analysis; lineage relationship; differentiation;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0501437102
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The biological basis underlying differentiation of naive (NAI) T cells into effector (EFFE) and memory (MEM) cells is incompletely understood. Furthermore, whether NAI T cells serially differentiate into EFFE and then MEM cells (linear differentiation) or whether they concurrently differentiate into either EFFE or MEM cells (parallel differentiation) remains unresolved. We isolated NAI, EFFE, and MEM CD8(+) T cell subsets from human peripheral blood and analyzed their gene expression by using microarrays. We identified 156 genes that strongly differentiate NAI, EFFE, and MEM CD8(+) T cells; these genes provide previously unrecognized markers to help identify each cell type. Using several statistical approaches to analyze and group the data (standard heat-map and hierarchical clustering, a unique circular representation, multivariate analyses based on principal components, and a clustering method based on phylogenetic parsimony analysis), we assessed the lineage relationships between these subsets and showed that MEM cells have gene expression patterns intermediate between NAI and EFFE T cells. Our analysis suggests a common differentiation pathway to an intermediate state followed by a split into EFFE or MEM cells, hence supporting the parallel differentiation model. As such, conditions under which NAI T cells are activated may determine the magnitude of both EFFE and MEM cells, which arise subsequently. A better understanding of these conditions may be very useful in the design of future vaccine strategies to maximize MEM cell generation.
引用
收藏
页码:5519 / 5523
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Abbas A.K., 2003, CELLULAR MOL IMMUNOL
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1979, Multivariate analysis
  • [3] Cutting edge: Rapid in vivo killing by memory CD8 T cells
    Barber, DL
    Wherry, EJ
    Ahmed, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2003, 171 (01) : 27 - 31
  • [4] Dudoit S, 2003, BIOTECHNIQUES, P45
  • [5] GE YC, 2003, TEST, V12, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02595811
  • [6] Phenotypic and functional separation of memory and effector human CD8(+) T cells
    Hamann, D
    Baars, P
    Rep, MHG
    Hooibrink, B
    KerkhofGarde, SR
    Klein, MR
    vanLier, RAW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 1997, 186 (09) : 1407 - 1418
  • [7] Gene expression profile in human leukocytes
    Hashimoto, SI
    Nagai, S
    Sese, J
    Suzuki, T
    Obata, A
    Sato, T
    Toyoda, N
    Dong, HY
    Kurachi, M
    Nagahata, T
    Shizuno, KI
    Morishita, S
    Matsushima, K
    [J]. BLOOD, 2003, 101 (09) : 3509 - 3513
  • [8] IHAKA R, 1996, J COMPUTATIONAL GRAP, V5, P299, DOI DOI 10.2307/1390807
  • [9] Molecular and functional profiling of memory CD8 T cell differentiation
    Kaech, SM
    Hemby, S
    Kersh, E
    Ahmed, R
    [J]. CELL, 2002, 111 (06) : 837 - 851
  • [10] Selective expression of the interleukin 7 receptor identifies effector CD8 T cells that give rise to long-lived memory cells
    Kaech, SM
    Tan, JT
    Wherry, EJ
    Konieczny, BT
    Surh, CD
    Ahmed, R
    [J]. NATURE IMMUNOLOGY, 2003, 4 (12) : 1191 - 1198