Potential improvements to current methods of recognizing single targets with a split-beam echo-sounder

被引:33
作者
Soule, M
Hampton, I
Barange, M
机构
[1] Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Roggebay, Cape Town, 8012
关键词
simulation; split-beam; target strength;
D O I
10.1006/jmsc.1996.0028
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
The precision of in situ target-strength (TS) estimates generated by TS analysers is directly related to the ability of single-target detectors to reject multiple echoes in dense aggregations. The rejection performance of five single-target detection algorithms, utilizing phase, amplitude, and echo duration information from a split-beam echo-sounder as rejection criteria, were tested by simulation for tar et pairs randomly generated in a three-dimensional resolution volume. Each algorithm was also tested for selection bias. It was found that all five algorithms accept multiple echoes preferentially when they are in phase. Of the phase methods, that which used the standard deviation in phase rejected the multiples most effectively, while the echo duration method performed relatively poorly. A method which relies on the magnitude of amplitude differences between split-beam elements performed well, particularly for stronger targets. Another advantage of this method is that it also preferentially accepts our-of-phase multiples, thus partly compensating for its bias towards multiples which are in phase. We conclude that implementation of algorithms using either the standard phase deviation or the amplitude difference will lead to a significant improvement in single-target detection. The performance of the amplitude difference technique is particularly encouraging, considering the potential improvements possible by using averaging techniques to minimize the influence of noise. (C) 1996 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 243
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Empirical determination of in situ target strengths of three loosely aggregated pelagic fish species [J].
Barange, M ;
Hampton, I ;
Soule, M .
ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 1996, 53 (02) :225-232
[2]  
BODHOLT H, 1990, UNPUB SCAND COOP M A
[3]  
Clay C.S., 1977, ACOUSTICAL OCEANOGRA
[4]  
FOOTE KG, 1994, ICES CM B, V40
[5]  
Higgins R. J., 1990, DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCE
[6]  
MACLENNAN DN, 1992, FISHERIES ACOUSTICS, V5
[7]  
ONA E, 1986, ICES CM B, V38
[8]  
REYNISSON P, 1993, ICES CM B, V40
[9]  
RUNCIMAN PB, 1986, THESIS U CAPE TOWN R
[10]  
*SIMRAD SUBS, 1993, SIMRAD EK500 SCI ECH