Deletion and duplication of 16p11.2 are associated with opposing effects on visual evoked potential amplitude

被引:26
作者
LeBlanc, Jocelyn J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nelson, Charles A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Boston Childrens Hosp, Labs Cognit Neurosci, Div Dev Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Neurol, FM Kirby Neurobiol Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Neurobiol, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Pediat, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源
MOLECULAR AUTISM | 2016年 / 7卷
关键词
16p11.2 copy number variation; Visual evoked potential; Visual cortex; SENSORY PROCESSING DEFICITS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; AUTISM; MATURATION; CHILDREN; INFANTS; LATENCY; ACUITY; LOCUS; STATE;
D O I
10.1186/s13229-016-0095-7
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: Duplication and deletion of the chromosomal region 16p11.2 cause a broad range of impairments, including intellectual disability, language disorders, and sensory symptoms. However, it is unclear how changes in 16p11.2 dosage affect cortical circuitry during development. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the visual evoked potential (VEP) could be used as a noninvasive quantitative measure of cortical processing in children with 16p11.2 copy number variation. Methods: Pattern-reversal VEPs were successfully recorded in 19 deletion carriers, 9 duplication carriers, and 13 typically developing children between the ages of 3 and 14 years. The stimulus was a black and white checkerboard (60') that reversed contrast at 2 Hz. VEP responses were extracted from continuous EEG recorded using a high-density elasticized electrode net. Results: Quantitative analysis of the VEP waveform revealed that, relative to controls, deletion carriers displayed increased amplitude and duplication carriers displayed diminished amplitude. Latencies of the VEP waveform components were unaffected by 16p11.2 status. P1 amplitude did not correlate with age, IQ, or head circumference. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that recording VEP is a useful method to assay cortical processing in children with 16p11.2 copy number variation. There is a gene dosage-dependent effect on P1 amplitude that merits further investigation. The VEP is directly translatable to animal models, offering a promising way to probe the neurobiological mechanisms underlying cortical dysfunction in this developmental disorder.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Hypothesis: Metabolic Contributions to 16p11.2 Deletion Syndrome
    Choo, Brandon Kar Meng
    Barnes, Sarah
    Sive, Hazel
    BIOESSAYS, 2025, 47 (03)
  • [22] 16p11.2 Microduplication and associated symptoms: A case study
    Knoll, Martin
    Arnett, Kirsten
    Hertza, Jeremy
    APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-CHILD, 2018, 7 (04) : 374 - 379
  • [23] The Cognitive and Behavioral Phenotype of the 16p11.2 Deletion in a Clinically Ascertained Population
    Hanson, Ellen
    Bernier, Raphael
    Porche, Ken
    Jackson, Frank I.
    Goin-Kochel, Robin P.
    Snyder, LeeAnne Green
    Snow, Anne V.
    Wallace, Arianne Stevens
    Campe, Katherine L.
    Zhang, Yuan
    Chen, Qixuan
    D'Angelo, Debra
    Moreno-De-Luca, Andres
    Orr, Patrick T.
    Boomer, K. B.
    Evans, David W.
    Kanne, Stephen
    Berry, Leandra
    Miller, Fiona K.
    Olson, Jennifer
    Sherr, Elliot
    Martin, Christa L.
    Ledbetter, David H.
    Spiro, John E.
    Chung, Wendy K.
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 77 (09) : 785 - 793
  • [24] Deep phenotyping of speech and language skills in individuals with 16p11.2 deletion
    Mei, Cristina
    Fedorenko, Evelina
    Amor, David J.
    Boys, Amber
    Hoeflin, Caitlyn
    Carew, Peter
    Burgess, Trent
    Fisher, Simon E.
    Morgan, Angela T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2018, 26 (05) : 676 - 686
  • [26] Microdeletion of 16p11.2 Associated With Endocardial Fibroelastosis
    Puvabanditsin, Surasak
    Nagar, Michael S.
    Joshi, Meera
    Lambert, George
    Garrow, Eugene
    Brandsma, Erik
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2010, 152A (09) : 2383 - 2386
  • [27] Brain Structure Changes in a 16p11.2 Deletion Mouse Model
    Nickl-Jockschat, Thomas
    Jangir, Vinod Kumar
    Grissom, Nicola
    McKee, Sarah
    Schoch, Hannah
    Bowman, Nicole
    Havekes, Robbert
    Kumar, Manoj
    Pickup, Stephen
    Poptani, Harish
    Reyes, Teresa
    Abel, Ted
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 40 : S288 - S288
  • [28] Language and Communication Deficits in Chromosome 16p11.2 Deletion Syndrome
    Salud Jimenez-Romero, Ma
    Fernandez-Urquiza, Maite
    Benitez-Burraco, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2022, 65 (12): : 4724 - 4740
  • [29] Sensorimotor Cortical Oscillations during Movement Preparation in 16p11.2 Deletion Carriers
    Hinkley, Leighton B. N.
    Dale, Corby L.
    Luks, Tracy L.
    Findlay, Anne M.
    Bukshpun, Polina
    Pojman, Nick
    Thieu, Tony
    Chung, Wendy K.
    Berman, Jeffrey
    Roberts, Timothy P. L.
    Mukherjee, Pratik
    Sherr, Elliott H.
    Nagarajan, Srikantan S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 39 (37) : 7321 - 7331
  • [30] The Atypical 16p11.2 Deletion: A Not So Atypical Microdeletion Syndrome?
    Barge-Schaapveld, Daniela Q. C. M.
    Maas, Saskia M.
    Polstra, Abeltje
    Knegt, Lia C.
    Hennekam, Raoul C. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2011, 155A (05) : 1066 - 1072