You see what you avoid: Fear of spiders and avoidance are associated with predominance of spiders in binocular rivalry

被引:2
作者
Mueller, Ulrich W. D. [1 ]
Gerdes, Antje B. M. [1 ]
Alpers, Georg W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mannheim, Sch Social Sci, Dept Psychol, Mannheim, Germany
关键词
Binocular rivalry; Visual perception; Perceptual biases; Anxiety; Fear of spiders; Specific phobia; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; EXPERIENTIAL AVOIDANCE; ANXIETY DISORDER; SIZE ESTIMATION; TOP-DOWN; PERCEPTION; ATTENTION; BIAS; EMOTION; PICTURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102513
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
What we see is the result of an efficient selection of cues in the visual stream. In addition to physical characteristics this process is also influenced by emotional salience of the cues. Previously, we showed in spider phobic patients that fear-related pictures gain preferential access to consciousness in binocular rivalry. We set out to replicate this in an independent unselected sample and examine the relationship of this perceptual bias with a range of symptom clusters. To this end, we recruited 79 participants with variable degrees of fear of spiders. To induce binocular rivalry, a picture of either a spider or a flower was projected to one eye, and a neutral geometric pattern to the other eye. Participants continuously reported what they saw. We correlated indices of perceptual dominance (first percept, dominance duration) with individual fear of spiders and with scores on specific symptom clusters of fear of spiders (i.e., vigilance, fixation, and avoidance coping). Overall, higher fear of spiders correlates with more predominace of spider pictures. In addition, this perceptual bias is uniquely associated with avoidance coping. Interestingly, this demonstrates that a perceptual bias, which is not intentionally controlled, is linked with an instrumental coping behavior, that has been implicated in the maintenance of pathological fear.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 69 条
[41]   Avoidance learning: a review of theoretical models and recent developments [J].
Krypotos, Angelos-Miltiadis ;
Effting, Marieke ;
Kindt, Merel ;
Beckers, Tom .
FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9
[42]  
Laux L., 1981, Das State-Trait-Angstinventar (STAI), DOI DOI 10.1002/DA.21968
[43]   Itsy bitsy spider? Valence and self-relevance predict size estimation [J].
Leibovich, Tali ;
Cohen, Noga ;
Henik, Avishai .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 121 :138-145
[44]   Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception [J].
Leopold, DA ;
Logothetis, NK .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 1999, 3 (07) :254-264
[45]   Temporal dynamics in bistable perception [J].
Mamassian, P ;
Goutcher, R .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2005, 5 (04) :361-375
[46]   Reward modulates perception in binocular rivalry [J].
Marx, Svenja ;
Einhaeuser, Wolfgang .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2015, 15 (01) :1-13
[47]   Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders [J].
Mathews, Andrew ;
MacLeod, Colin .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 1 :167-195
[48]   Rumination as a transdiagnostic factor in depression and anxiety [J].
McLaughlin, Katie A. ;
Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2011, 49 (03) :186-193
[49]   Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures [J].
Meng, M ;
Tong, F .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2004, 4 (07) :539-551
[50]   COGNITIVE BIASES AND THE EMOTIONAL DISORDERS [J].
MINEKA, S ;
SUTTON, SK .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1992, 3 (01) :65-69