A method for identification of an effective Winkler foundation for large diameter offshore wind turbine support structures based on in-situ measured small-strain soil response and 3D modelling

被引:26
作者
Versteijlen, W. G. [1 ,2 ]
Metrikine, A. V. [2 ]
van Dalen, K. N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Siemens Wind Power, Beatrixlaan 800, NL-2595 BN The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, Stevinweg 1, NL-2628 CN Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Offshore wind foundations; Fundamental natural frequency; Small-strain soil stiffness; In-situ seismic measurement; 3D to 1D modelling translation; DYNAMIC-RESPONSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.007
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A procedure is presented for the derivation of an effective small-strain soil stiffness governing the soil structure interaction of large-diameter monopiles. As a first step, geophysical measurements are used to estimate the depth-dependent shear modulus G of the soil stratum. The second step is to use this modulus and an estimated Poisson's ratio and density in a 3D model, which captures the deformation of both the monopile and the soil. As a final step, a new method is proposed to use the computed 3D response for identification of a depth dependent stiffness of an effective Winkler foundation. This stiffness can be used in a 1D model, which is more fit for design purposes. The presented procedure is deemed more appropriate than the often used "p-y curve" method, which was once calibrated for slender flexible piles and for which the input is based on the large-strain cone penetration test. The three steps are demonstrated for a particular design location. It is also shown that the displacements of the 3D model are smaller and the resulting fundamental natural frequency is higher than calculated with the p-y method. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 236
页数:16
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Abdel-Rahman K, 2005, INT S FRONT OFFSH GE, P309
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, DNV-OS-J101
[3]  
Ashford SA, 2003, J GEOTECH GEOENVIRON, V129, P234, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:3(234)
[4]  
Bowles J.E., 1996, Foundation analysis and design, V5th
[5]  
Carcione J.M., 2007, Handbook of Geophysical Exploration: Seismic Exploration, V38
[6]   A probabilistic analysis of the dynamic response of monopile foundations: Soil variability and its consequences [J].
Damgaard, M. ;
Andersen, L. V. ;
Ibsen, L. B. ;
Toft, H. S. ;
Sorensen, J. D. .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2015, 41 :46-59
[7]   Dynamic response sensitivity of an offshore wind turbine for varying subsoil conditions [J].
Damgaard, M. ;
Andersen, L. V. ;
Ibsen, L. B. .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2015, 101 :227-234
[8]   Effects of soil-structure interaction on real time dynamic response of offshore wind turbines on monopiles [J].
Damgaard, M. ;
Zania, V. ;
Andersen, L. V. ;
Ibsen, L. B. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 75 :388-401
[9]   Assessment of the dynamic behaviour of saturated soil subjected to cyclic loading from offshore monopile wind turbine foundations [J].
Damgaard, M. ;
Bayat, M. ;
Andersen, L. V. ;
Ibsen, L. B. .
COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2014, 61 :116-126
[10]  
de Groot A, 2014, DETERMINATION DYNAMI