Utility of Oncotype DX Risk Estimates in Clinically Intermediate Risk Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Normal, Grade II, Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancers

被引:81
作者
Kelly, Catherine M.
Krishnamurthy, Savitri [2 ]
Bianchini, Giampaolo [4 ]
Litton, Jennifer K.
Gonzalez-Angulo, Ana M. [3 ]
Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
Pusztai, Lajos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Med Oncol, Unit 1354, Houston, TX 77230 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77230 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Syst Biol, Houston, TX 77230 USA
[4] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Div Med Oncol, Milan, Italy
关键词
recurrence score; adjuvant chemotherapy; breast cancer; 21-GENE RECURRENCE SCORE; GENE-EXPRESSION; ASSAY; CHEMOTHERAPY; DECISIONS; TAMOXIFEN; ADJUVANT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.25269
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Oncotype DX breast cancer assay (Genomic Health, Redwood City, Calif) stratifies patients with early breast cancer according to risk of distant recurrence. The authors hypothesized that the test is ordered when clinicopathological variables yield equivocal risk estimates. The current study also showed how often the test clarifies clinically ambiguous risk status. METHODS: The authors examined clinical/pathological characteristics and calculated risk of recurrence with Adjuvantl for 309 consecutive patients who underwent Oncotype DX testing at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. RESULTS: Of the patients comprising this study, most had stage I/II (n = 306, 99%) and grade I/II tumors (n = 236, 76%). The median risk of recurrence by Adjuvantl was 16% (IQR 11.2 to 20.4). Oncotype DX stratified 52% (n = 160), 40% (n = 122) and 9% (n = 27) of this clinically intermediate risk population into low, intermediate, and high risk groups, respectively. Correlation between projected risk of recurrence by Adjuvantl (Adjuvantl, online software and website) and Oncotype DX was minimal (r = 0.13). Recurrence score (P < .0001), but not age or tumor size, was higher in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. In all 3 grade subsets, recurrence score was higher in those who received chemotherapy compared with those who did not (P = .02, P < .0001, and P = .0009, respectively). All lobular carcinomas (n = 40) were classified as low/intermediate risk. CONCLUSIONS: Oncotype DX yielded potentially informative risk assignments in patients considered indeterminate risk by routine clinical variables. However, 40% of the time test results reflected intermediate risk, with widely used recurrence score thresholds. This proportion increased to 66% using revised thresholds implemented by National Cancer Institute's Trial Assigning IndividuaLized Options for Treatment (Rx), or TAILORx. Cancer 2010;116:5161-7. (c) 2010 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:5161 / 5167
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial [J].
Albain, Kathy S. ;
Barlow, William E. ;
Shak, Steven ;
Hortobagyi, Gabriel N. ;
Livingston, Robert B. ;
Yeh, I-Tien ;
Ravdin, Peter ;
Bugarini, Roberto ;
Boehner, Frederick L. ;
Davidson, Nancy E. ;
Sledge, George W. ;
Winer, Eric P. ;
Hudis, Clifford ;
Ingle, James N. ;
Perez, Edith A. ;
Pritchard, Kathleen I. ;
Shepherd, Lois ;
Gralow, Julie R. ;
Yoshizawa, Carl ;
Allred, D. Craig ;
Osborne, C. Kent ;
Hayes, Daniel F. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2010, 11 (01) :55-65
[2]   Prediction of Risk of Distant Recurrence Using the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Node-Negative and Node-Positive Postmenopausal Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Anastrozole or Tamoxifen: A TransATAC Study [J].
Dowsett, Mitch ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Wale, Christopher ;
Forbes, John ;
Mallon, Elizabeth A. ;
Salter, Janine ;
Quinn, Emma ;
Dunbier, Anita ;
Baum, Michael ;
Buzdar, Aman ;
Howell, Anthony ;
Bugarini, Roberto ;
Baehner, Frederick L. ;
Shak, Steven .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (11) :1829-1834
[3]   Prognostic utility of the 21-gene assay in hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer compared with classical clinicopathologic features [J].
Goldstein, Lori J. ;
Gray, Robert ;
Badve, Sunil ;
Childs, Barrett H. ;
Yoshizawa, Carl ;
Rowley, Steve ;
Shak, Steven ;
Baehner, Frederick L. ;
Ravdin, Peter M. ;
Davidson, Nancy E. ;
Sledge, George W., Jr. ;
Perez, Edith A. ;
Shulman, Lawrence N. ;
Martino, Silvana ;
Sparano, Joseph A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (25) :4063-4071
[4]   American society of clinical oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer [J].
Harris, Lyndsay ;
Fritsche, Herbert ;
Mennel, Robert ;
Norton, Larry ;
Ravdin, Peter ;
Taube, Sheila ;
Somerfield, Mark R. ;
Hayes, Daniel F. ;
Bast, Robert C., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (33) :5287-5312
[5]   The Influence of a Gene Expression Profile on Breast Cancer Decisions [J].
Henry, Leonard R. ;
Stojadinovic, Alexander ;
Swain, Sandra M. ;
Prindiville, Sheila ;
Cordes, Rose ;
Soballe, Peter W. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 99 (06) :319-323
[6]   Primary systemic chemotherapy of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast [J].
Katz, Artur ;
Saad, Everardo D. ;
Porter, Peggy ;
Pusztai, Lajos .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (01) :55-62
[7]   Systematic review: Gene expression profiling assays in early-stage breast cancer [J].
Marchionni, Luigi ;
Wilson, Renee F. ;
Wolff, Antonio C. ;
Marinopoulos, Spyridon ;
Parmigiani, Giovanni ;
Bass, Eric B. ;
Goodman, Steven N. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 148 (05) :358-W81
[8]  
*NCCN, 2009 NCCN CLIN PRACT
[9]   Population-based validation of the prognostic model ADJUVANT! for early breast cancer [J].
Olivotto, IA ;
Bajdik, CD ;
Ravdin, PM ;
Speers, CH ;
Coldman, AJ ;
Norris, BD ;
Davis, GJ ;
Chia, SK ;
Gelmon, KA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (12) :2716-2725
[10]   A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer [J].
Paik, S ;
Shak, S ;
Tang, G ;
Kim, C ;
Baker, J ;
Cronin, M ;
Baehner, FL ;
Walker, MG ;
Watson, D ;
Park, T ;
Hiller, W ;
Fisher, ER ;
Wickerham, DL ;
Bryant, J ;
Wolmark, N .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (27) :2817-2826