Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF) is a valid screening tool in chemotherapy outpatients

被引:142
作者
Abbott, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
Teleni, L. [3 ]
McKavanagh, D. [2 ]
Watson, J. [2 ]
McCarthy, A. L. [2 ,4 ]
Isenring, E. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Gold Coast Univ Hosp, Southport, Qld 4215, Australia
[2] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Woolloongabba, Qld 4102, Australia
[3] Bond Univ, Robina, Qld 4226, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia
关键词
Nutrition screening; Nutrition assessment; PG-SGA; PG-SGA SF; Oncology; NUTRITIONAL-STATUS; CANCER; MALNUTRITION; SYMPTOMS; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-016-3196-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In the oncology population where malnutrition prevalence is high, more descriptive screening tools can provide further information to assist triaging and capture acute change. The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF) is a component of a nutritional assessment tool which could be used for descriptive nutrition screening. The purpose of this study was to conduct a secondary analysis of nutrition screening and assessment data to identify the most relevant information contributing to the PG-SGA SF to identify malnutrition risk with high sensitivity and specificity. This was an observational, cross-sectional study of 300 consecutive adult patients receiving ambulatory anti-cancer treatment at an Australian tertiary hospital. Anthropometric and patient descriptive data were collected. The scored PG-SGA generated a score for nutritional risk (PG-SGA SF) and a global rating for nutrition status. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were generated to determine optimal cut-off scores for combinations of the PG-SGA SF boxes with the greatest sensitivity and specificity for predicting malnutrition according to scored PG-SGA global rating. The additive scores of boxes 1-3 had the highest sensitivity (90.2 %) while maintaining satisfactory specificity (67.5 %) and demonstrating high diagnostic value (AUC = 0.85, 95 % CI = 0.81-0.89). The inclusion of box 4 (PG-SGA SF) did not add further value as a screening tool (AUC = 0.85, 95 % CI = 0.80-0.89; sensitivity 80.4 %; specificity 72.3 %). The validity of the PG-SGA SF in chemotherapy outpatients was confirmed. The present study however demonstrated that the functional capacity question (box 4) does not improve the overall discriminatory value of the PG-SGA SF.
引用
收藏
页码:3883 / 3887
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   A novel, automated nutrition screening system as a predictor of nutritional risk in an oncology day treatment unit (ODTU) [J].
Abbott, J. ;
Teleni, L. ;
McKavanagh, D. ;
Watson, J. ;
McCarthy, A. ;
Isenring, E. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2014, 22 (08) :2107-2112
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, NUTR DIET, V66, pS1
[3]  
Bauer J, 2003, ASIA PAC J CLIN NUTR, V12, P257
[4]   Use of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer [J].
Bauer, J ;
Capra, S ;
Ferguson, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2002, 56 (08) :779-785
[5]  
Bauer J. D., 2006, Nutrition & Dietetics, V63, pS5
[6]   Role of Nutrition Impact Symptoms in Predicting Nutritional Status and Clinical Outcome in Hemodialysis Patients: A Potential Screening Tool [J].
Campbell, Katrina L. ;
Bauer, Judith D. ;
Ikehiro, Aya ;
Johnson, David W. .
JOURNAL OF RENAL NUTRITION, 2013, 23 (04) :302-307
[7]   Malnutrition and Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Implications for Practice [J].
Davidson, Wendy ;
Teleni, Laisa ;
Muller, Jacqueline ;
Ferguson, Maree ;
McCarthy, Alexandra Leigh ;
Vick, Jo ;
Lsenring, Elisabeth .
ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2012, 39 (04) :398-398
[8]  
Davies Michelle, 2005, Eur J Oncol Nurs, V9 Suppl 2, pS64, DOI 10.1016/j.ejon.2005.09.005
[9]   WHAT IS SUBJECTIVE GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF NUTRITIONAL-STATUS [J].
DETSKY, AS ;
MCLAUGHLIN, JR ;
BAKER, JP ;
JOHNSTON, N ;
WHITTAKER, S ;
MENDELSON, RA ;
JEEJEEBHOY, KN .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 1987, 11 (01) :8-13
[10]  
Ferguson M L, 1999, Australas Radiol, V43, P325, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1673.1999.433665.x