Trial of a new pain assessment tool in patients with low education:: the full cup test

被引:10
作者
Erguen, U.
Say, B.
Ozer, G.
Yildirim, O.
Kocaturk, O.
Konar, D.
Kudiaki, C.
Inan, L.
机构
[1] Ankara Educat & Res Hosp, Dept Neurol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Training & Res Hosp, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Mersin Univ, Dept Psychol, Mersin, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01525.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims and Scope: Pain is subjective and pain assessment depends on the patient's self-report. The measurement of pain needs simple tools, especially in patients with low education. There are limited reports about pain assessment in this type of patient. The aims of the present study were to develop a pain scale that is easy for patients with low education to understand and to evaluate its usefulness in these patients. Methods: A total of 128 adult non-demented patients presenting with headaches or rheumatologic pain were included in this study. The first phase of the study involved 114 patients and aimed to estimate the usefulness of the full cup test (FCT) compared with the visual analogue scale (VAS). The second phase of the study involved 23 patients with headaches selected randomly from the 114 patients and assessed the usefulness of the FCT for detecting changes in pain levels. The third phase of the study involved 14 patients with low education suffering from headaches and examined the usefulness of the FCT in these patients. Results: The mean VAS and FCT scores were statistically correlated and reliable and did not differ significantly. Patients with low education understood the FCT more easily than the VAS. Conclusion: We concluded that the FCT is useful for both assessing and differentiating changes in pain, and is suitable for assessing pain in patients with low education.
引用
收藏
页码:1692 / 1696
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data [J].
Breivik, EK ;
Björnsson, GA ;
Skovlund, E .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2000, 16 (01) :22-28
[2]   Individual responder analyses for pain: does one pain scale fit all? [J].
Dionne, RA ;
Bartoshuk, L ;
Mogil, J ;
Witter, J .
TRENDS IN PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 26 (03) :125-130
[3]   Pain intensity assessment in older adults - Use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales with younger adults [J].
Herr, KA ;
Spratt, K ;
Mobily, PR ;
Richardson, G .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2004, 20 (04) :207-219
[4]   Visual analog scale pain reporting was standardized [J].
Kane, RL ;
Bershadsky, B ;
Rockwood, T ;
Saleh, K ;
Islam, NC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (06) :618-623
[5]   Measurement of pain [J].
Katz, J ;
Melzack, R .
SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1999, 79 (02) :231-+
[6]   COMPARATIVE MEASUREMENT SENSITIVITY OF SHORT AND LONGER HEALTH-STATUS INSTRUMENTS [J].
KATZ, JN ;
LARSON, MG ;
PHILLIPS, CB ;
FOSSEL, AH ;
LIANG, MH .
MEDICAL CARE, 1992, 30 (10) :917-925
[7]   MEASUREMENT OF PAIN - PATIENT PREFERENCE DOES NOT CONFOUND PAIN MEASUREMENT [J].
KREMER, E ;
ATKINSON, JH ;
IGNELZI, RJ .
PAIN, 1981, 10 (02) :241-248
[8]  
Lund Irene, 2006, Acupunct Med, V24, P109
[9]   Responsiveness of visual analogue and McGill pain scale measures [J].
Scrimshaw, SV ;
Maher, C .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 24 (08) :501-504