The co-evolution of individual behaviors and social institutions

被引:181
作者
Bowles, S
Choi, JK
Hopfensitz, A
机构
[1] Santa Fe Inst, Santa Fe, NM 87501 USA
[2] Univ Siena, Fac Econ, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Santa Fe Inst, Dept Econ, Amherst, MA 01002 USA
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Ctr Res Expt Econ & Decis Making, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
human cooperation; multi-level selection; intergroup conflicts;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00060-2
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We present agent-based simulations of a model of a deme-structured population in which group differences in social institutions are culturally transmitted and individual behaviors are genetically transmitted. We use a standard extended fitness accounting framework to identify the parameter space for which this co-evolutionary process generates high levels of group-beneficial behaviors. We show that intergroup conflicts may explain the evolutionary success of both: (a) altruistic forms of human sociality towards unrelated members of one's group; and (b) group-level institutional structures such as food sharing which have emerged and diffused repeatedly in a wide variety of ecologies during the course of human history. Group-beneficial behaviors may evolve if (a) they inflict sufficient fitness costs on outgroup individuals and (b) group-level institutions limit the individual fitness costs of these behaviors and thereby attenuate within-group selection against these behaviors. Thus, the evolutionary success of individually costly but group-beneficial behaviors in the relevant environments during the first 90,000 years of anatomically modern human existence may have been a consequence of distinctive human capacities in social institution building. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 147
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
[11]   Economic institutions as ecological niches [J].
Bowles, S .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2000, 23 (01) :148-+
[12]  
BOWLES S, 2003, UNPUB EVOLUTION STRO
[13]  
BOWLES S, 2003, COEVOLUTION LOVE HAT
[14]  
Bowles S., 2001, Social Dynamics, P155
[15]  
BOWLES S, 2003, 1 PROPERTY RIGHTS RE
[16]   GROUP SELECTION AMONG ALTERNATIVE EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGIES [J].
BOYD, R ;
RICHERSON, PJ .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1990, 145 (03) :331-342
[17]   Group beneficial norms can spread rapidly in a structured population [J].
Boyd, R ;
Richerson, PJ .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2002, 215 (03) :287-296
[18]  
Boyd R., 1985, CULTURE EVOLUTIONARY
[19]  
BOYD R, 2003, IN PRESS P NATL ACAD
[20]  
Buss L, 1987, The evolution of individuality