Measuring Housing Stress: How Much do Definitions Matter?

被引：62

作者：

Nepal, Binod ^{[1
]}

Tanton, Robert ^{[1
]}

Harding, Ann ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Canberra, Natl Ctr Social & Econ Modelling NATSEM, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

来源：

URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH | 2010年 / 28卷 / 02期

关键词：

Housing stress; housing affordability; ratio measures; Australia; AFFORDABILITY;

D O I：

10.1080/08111141003797454

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

There has been extensive debate in Australia in recent years about the most appropriate measure of housing stress. This article presents estimates of housing stress in Australia and examines the comparative effects of various definitions on the proportion of households in housing stress. Six measures of housing stress are tested, all with different types of income and criteria. Up-to-date estimates of housing stress at the national and state/territory level are produced from the 2005-2006 Survey of Income and Housing from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. These estimates are then compared to identify the least sensitive indicator of housing stress across household tenure type.

引用

页码：211 / 224

页数：14

共 31 条

[1]

ABS, 2005, HOUS OCC COSTS AUSTR

[2]

ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics), 2007, SURV INC HOUS CONF U

[3]

*AIHW, 2006, PUBL RENT HOUS 2005

[4]

[Anonymous], 3 AUSTR HOUS URB RES

[5]

[Anonymous], 2002, Measures of Australia's progress, Canberra

[6]

[Anonymous], NAT SUMM HOUS AFF CA

[7]

*AUSTR SOC INCL BO, 2010, SOC INC AUSTR AUSTR

[8]

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2007, SURV INC HOUS US GUI

[9]

Berry Michael., 2003, Urban Policy and Research, V21, P413, DOI DOI 10.1080/0811114032000147430

[10]

*COMM AUSTR, 2008, GOOD HOUS HARD FIND

← 1 2 3 4 →