Retrospective Study of Implant-Retained Orbital Prostheses: Implant Survival and Patient Satisfaction

被引:16
作者
Nemli, Secil Karakoca [1 ]
Aydin, Cemal [1 ]
Yilmaz, Handan [1 ]
Sarisoy, Senol [2 ]
Kasko, Yeliz [3 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Fac Dent, TR-06510 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, TR-06510 Ankara, Turkey
[3] Ankara Univ, Biometry Genet Unit, Dept Anim Sci, Fac Agr, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Extraoral implant; orbital prostheses; implant survival; patient satisfaction; CRANIOFACIAL PROSTHESES; RETENTION SYSTEMS; DEFECTS; REHABILITATION; OUTCOMES; THERAPY; RATES;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181e2083a
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Extraoral implants provide the prostheses excellent stability and retention. However, the use of implants in the orbit showed questionable survival rates. Furthermore, evaluation of this treatment from the patients' point of view is lacking in clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of implant-retained prosthetic treatment of orbital defects in implant survival, peri-implant soft tissue health, and patients' satisfaction. Materials and Methods: Extraoral implants were placed in the orbital defects. After a 3- to 6-month osseointegration period, prostheses were fabricated. Recall examinations were performed 1 week and 3 and 6 months after prosthesis insertion, subsequently, every 6 months. Implant survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A 5-point scale was used to record tissue health. A questionnaire was applied to obtain the patients' perceptions of prosthesis after insertion and at 1-year recall. Results: A total of 36 patients (17 men and 19 women) with 109 implants were evaluated. Mean age was 44.8 (18.3) years. The overall cumulative survival rate was 69.4%; 75% for nonirradiated patients and 62.5% for irradiated patients. Three months after prostheses insertion, no skin reaction was observed in 12 patients, grade 1 and 2 reactions was observed in 16 patients, and granulation was observed in 7 patients. In 2 years, grade 2 and 3 reactions decreased. Slight incensement was observed in skin reactions after the second year. Patients' satisfaction on appearance decreased after 1 year. A statistically significant increase was found in comfort, retention, ease of use, and self-confidence (P < 0.05). The long-term predictability of orbital implants is still questionable. Therefore, orbital implants should be used in patients who understand complications, and meticulous hygiene is required. Although complications are relatively frequent in the orbit, implant-retained prostheses enhance the patients' quality of life, providing self-confidence.
引用
收藏
页码:1178 / 1183
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Extra-oral endosseous craniofacial implants and radiotherapy [J].
Abu-Serriah, MM ;
McGowan, DA ;
Moos, KF ;
Bagg, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2003, 32 (06) :585-592
[2]   Outcome of extra-oral craniofacial endosseous implants [J].
Abu-Serriah, MM ;
McGowan, DA ;
Moos, KF ;
Bagg, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 39 (04) :269-275
[3]   PRESENT CLINICAL-APPLICATIONS OF OSSEOINTEGRATED PERCUTANEOUS IMPLANTS [J].
ALBREKTSSON, T ;
BRANEMARK, PI ;
JACOBSSON, M ;
TJELLSTROM, A .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1987, 79 (05) :721-730
[4]   A longitudinal study of quality of life outcomes in older adults requesting implant prostheses and complete removable dentures [J].
Allen, PF ;
McMillan, AS .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2003, 14 (02) :173-179
[5]  
Allen PF, 2000, INT J ORAL MAX SURG, V29, P99
[6]   Closed-fleld titanium magnets for the retention of complex craniofacial prostheses [J].
Alvi, R ;
McPhail, J ;
Hancock, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2002, 55 (08) :668-670
[7]   Effects of implant anchorage on midface prostheses [J].
Arcuri, MR ;
LaVelle, WE ;
Fyler, A ;
Funk, G .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1997, 78 (05) :496-500
[8]   Treatment satisfaction with facial prostheses [J].
Chang, TL ;
Garrett, N ;
Roumanas, E ;
Beumer, J .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2005, 94 (03) :275-280
[9]   Within-subject comparison of maxillary long-bar implant-retained prostheses with and without palatal coverage:: patient-based outcomes [J].
de Albuquerque, RF ;
Lund, JP ;
Tang, L ;
Larivée, J ;
de Grandmont, P ;
Gauthier, G ;
Feine, JS .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2000, 11 (06) :555-565
[10]   Retention Systems to Implant-Supported Craniofacial Prostheses [J].
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho ;
Delben, Juliana Aparecida ;
Monteiro, Douglas Roberto ;
dos Santos, Daniela Micheline .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 20 (03) :889-891