Enhanced diagnostic accuracy for neurocognitive disorders: a revised cut-off approach for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment

被引:82
作者
Thomann, Alessandra E. [1 ,2 ]
Berres, Manfred [3 ]
Goettel, Nicolai [2 ,4 ]
Steiner, Luzius A. [2 ,4 ]
Monsch, Andreas U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dept Geriatr Med FELIX PLATTER, Memory Clin, Burgfelderstr 101, CH-4055 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Basel, Anesthesiol, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Appl Sci Koblenz, Dept Math & Technol, Koblenz, Germany
[4] Univ Basel, Dept Clin Res, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Sensitivity and specificity; Neuropsychology; Mental status and dementia tests; Montreal Cognitive Assessment; Mini Mental State Examination; Neurocognitive disorders; ROC curve; Cognitive dysfunction; Area under curve; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; LIKELIHOOD RATIOS; ASSESSMENT MOCA; NORMATIVE DATA; DEMENTIA; IMPAIRMENT; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13195-020-00603-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has good sensitivity for mild cognitive impairment, but specificity is low when the original cut-off (25/26) is used. We aim to revise the cut-off on the German MoCA for its use in clinical routine. Methods Data were analyzed from 496 Memory Clinic outpatients (447 individuals with a neurocognitive disorder; 49 with cognitive normal findings) and from 283 normal controls. Cut-offs were identified based on (a) Youden's index and (b) the 10th percentile of the control group. Results A cut-off of 23/24 on the MoCA had better correct classification rates than the MMSE and the original MoCA cut-off. Compared to the original MoCA cut-off, the cut-off of 23/24 points had higher specificity (92% vs 63%), but lower sensitivity (65% vs 86%). Introducing two separate cut-offs increased diagnostic accuracies with 92% specificity (23/24 points) and 91% sensitivity (26/27 points). Scores between these two cut-offs require further examinations. Conclusions Using two separate cut-offs for the MoCA combined with scores in an indecisive area enhances the accuracy of cognitive screening.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   A systematic review of the diagnostic test accuracy of brief cognitive tests to detect amnestic mild cognitive impairment [J].
Ozer, Seline ;
Young, John ;
Champ, Claire ;
Burke, Melanie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 31 (11) :1139-1150
[22]  
Prince M, 2016, World Alzheimer report 2016: improving healthcare for people living with dementia: coverage, quality and costs now and in the future
[23]   pROC: an open-source package for R and S plus to analyze and compare ROC curves [J].
Robin, Xavier ;
Turck, Natacha ;
Hainard, Alexandre ;
Tiberti, Natalia ;
Lisacek, Frederique ;
Sanchez, Jean-Charles ;
Mueller, Markus .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 12
[24]   Montreal Cognitive Assessment Performance among Community-Dwelling African Americans [J].
Rossetti, Heidi C. ;
Lacritz, Laura H. ;
Hynan, Linda S. ;
Cullum, C. Munro ;
Van Wright, Aaron ;
Weiner, Myron F. .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 32 (02) :238-244
[25]   Normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in a population-based sample [J].
Rossetti, Heidi C. ;
Lacritz, Laura H. ;
Cullum, C. Munro ;
Weiner, Myron F. .
NEUROLOGY, 2011, 77 (13) :1272-1275
[26]  
SHEIKH J I, 1986, Clinical Gerontologist, V5, P165
[27]   The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Validity and utility in a memory clinic setting [J].
Smith, Tasha ;
Gildeh, Nadia ;
Holmes, Clive .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2007, 52 (05) :329-332
[28]  
Strauss E., 2006, A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms and commentary, V3rd, DOI DOI 10.1080/09084280701280502
[29]   Editorial Introduction to the Special Issue on Neuropsychological Assessment in Aging [J].
Summers, Mathew J. ;
Bondi, Mark W. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2017, 27 (04) :303-304
[30]   The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Normative Data from a German-Speaking Cohort and Comparison with International Normative Samples [J].
Thomann, Alessandra E. ;
Goettel, Nicolai ;
Monsch, Raphael J. ;
Berres, Manfred ;
Jahn, Thomas ;
Steiner, Luzius A. ;
Monsch, Andreas U. .
JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2018, 64 (02) :643-655