Prostate cancer detection in men with prior high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical prostate biopsy

被引:82
作者
Park, S [1 ]
Shinohara, K
Grossfeld, GD
Carroll, PR
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Program Urol Oncol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Mt Zion Comprehens Canc Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia; biopsy; detection;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66318-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We used clinical variables to predict prostate cancer detection on re-biopsy among patients diagnosed with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) or atypia on initial prostate biopsy, Materials and Methods: A total of 45 men with atypia and 43 with high grade PIN were eligible for our study. Clinical variables were tested with univariate and multivariate logistic regression to predict who would have cancer on re-biopsy. We also calculated the odds of detecting cancer with various repeat sampling strategies and determined whether the location of initial atypia or high grade PIN is correlated to that of cancer on re-biopsy. Results: Of the patients in the atypia and high grade PIN groups 51% had cancer on re-biopsy. Cancer was diagnosed significantly earlier in the high grade PIN than in the atypia cohort (average 7.5 versus 22.9 months, respectively, p = 0.005). Multivariate logistic modeling showed that digital rectal examination and patient age were independent predictors of cancer in atypia, whereas no variables were significantly predictive for high grade PIN. Of cancers in the atypia and high grade PIN 65% and 74%, respectively, would have been detected if re-biopsy was focused only at the initial site of disease. Conclusions: Men with atypia or high grade PIN merit close followup because 50% will have cancer on re-biopsy as will those who are older with an abnormal digital rectal examination, Although re-biopsy should focus primarily on the original site of atypia or high grade PIN, cancer detection significantly increases with the sampling of adjacent sites.
引用
收藏
页码:1409 / 1414
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   THE SIGNIFICANCE OF PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA [J].
ABOSEIF, S ;
SHINOHARA, K ;
WEIDNER, N ;
NARAYAN, P ;
CARROLL, PR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 76 (03) :355-359
[2]   Repeat biopsy strategies for men with atypical diagnoses on initial prostate needle biopsy [J].
Allen, EA ;
Kahane, H ;
Epstein, JI .
UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (05) :803-807
[3]  
Bostwick DG, 1996, CANCER, V78, P330, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960715)78:2<330::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-W
[5]   THE INCIDENCE OF HIGH-GRADE PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA IN NEEDLE BIOPSIES [J].
BOSTWICK, DG ;
QIAN, JQ ;
FRANKEL, K .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (05) :1791-1794
[6]   Follow-up of atypical prostate needle biopsies suspicious for cancer [J].
Chan, TY ;
Epstein, JI .
UROLOGY, 1999, 53 (02) :351-355
[7]  
Cheville JC, 1997, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V108, P633
[8]   PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA IS A RISK FACTOR FOR ADENOCARCINOMA - PREDICTIVE ACCURACY IN NEEDLE BIOPSIES [J].
DAVIDSON, D ;
BOSTWICK, DG ;
QIAN, JQ ;
WOLLAN, PC ;
OESTERLING, JE ;
RUDDERS, RA ;
SIROKY, M ;
STILMANT, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (04) :1295-1299
[9]   REPEAT PROSTATE NEEDLE-BIOPSY - WHO NEEDS IT [J].
ELLIS, WJ ;
BRAWER, MK .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (05) :1496-1498
[10]   The relationship between prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer: Critical issues [J].
Haggman, MJ ;
Macoska, JA ;
Wojno, KJ ;
Oesterling, JE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (01) :12-22