Attitude, knowledge and informed choice towards prenatal screening for Down Syndrome: a cross-sectional study

被引:19
作者
Pop-Tudose, Melania Elena [1 ]
Popescu-Spineni, Dana [2 ,3 ]
Armean, Petru [2 ]
Pop, Ioan Victor [1 ]
机构
[1] Iuliu Hatieganu Univ Med & Pharm, Dept Med Genet, Pasteur Louis St 6, Cluj Napoca 400349, Romania
[2] Carol Davila Univ Med & Pharm, Dept Specif Disciplines, Fac Midwifery & Nursing, Bucharest, Romania
[3] Francisc I Rainer Anthropol Res Ctr, Bucharest, Romania
关键词
Attitude; Down syndrome; Informed consent; Knowledge; Prenatal screening; PREGNANT-WOMEN; OPTIONS; ANXIETY; TESTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-018-2077-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundDown Syndrome screening test is a bridge between knowledge and uncertainty, safety and risk, unpredictability and desire to know in order to gain control. It may be accepted either not to have a baby with Down syndrome, or to prepare to have a baby with this condition. Every woman should understand that it is an option and should be encouraged to make their own decisions based on information and personal values. The implications and possible subsequent scenarios differentiate this type of test from the common biochemical tests performed during pregnancy, of paramount importance being the right to make informed choices. The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge and attitude towards prenatal Down syndrome screening in order to asses to what extent the Romanian women make informed choices in this area.MethodsA cross-sectional study was carried out that included 530 postpartum women, clients of Romania' south-east region maternities, during April-September 2016. The level of knowledge and the attitude concerning the Down syndrome screening were evaluated using a questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0.Results48.1% of the women have never heard about any tests for Down Syndrome and from those 51.9% who have heard, only 14.2% made an informed choice, 78.9% had a positive attitude for screening, 88% were classified as having insufficient knowledge and 68.3% made a value-consistent decision to accept or decline prenatal screening. A higher knowledge level was associated with a higher education level and the urban residence. The information satisfaction and confidence in the overall value of screening were predictive factors of positive attitude. More informed choices were made by women monitored by an obstetrician in a private practice.ConclusionsThe prenatal screening tests for Down Syndrome were mostly unknown and the women who accepted or not to perform a test were insufficiently knowledgeable that means that the ethical concept of the informed choice wasn't followed. In our opinion the Romanian Health System needs to improve the antenatal policy by developing an adequate information strategy at the reproductive population level based on a network of trained specialists.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins, 2016, OBSTET GYNECOL, V127, pe123, DOI [DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001406, 10.1097/A0G.0000000000001406, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001406]
[2]   The role of attitudes towards the targets of behaviour in predicting and informing prenatal testing choices [J].
Bryant, Louise D. ;
Green, Josephine M. ;
Hewison, Jenny .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2010, 25 (10) :1175-1194
[3]  
Constantine M L., 2014, Clinical ethics, V9, P17, DOI DOI 10.1177/1477750913511339
[4]   Explaining variation in Down's syndrome screening uptake: comparing the Netherlands with England and Denmark using documentary analysis and expert stakeholder interviews [J].
Crombag, Neeltje M. T. H. ;
Vellinga, Ynke E. ;
Kluijfhout, Sandra A. ;
Bryant, Louise D. ;
Ward, Pat A. ;
Iedema-Kuiper, Rita ;
Schielen, Peter C. J. I. ;
Bensing, Jozien M. ;
Visser, Gerard H. A. ;
Tabor, Ann ;
Hirst, Janet .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
[5]   PRENATAL SCREENING: AN ETHICAL AGENDA FOR THE NEAR FUTURE [J].
de Jong, Antina ;
de Wert, Guido M. W. R. .
BIOETHICS, 2015, 29 (01) :46-55
[6]   Decision support in Down's syndrome screening using multi-criteria decision analysis: a pilot study [J].
Erenbourg, Anna ;
Stephenson, Judith ;
Pandya, Pranav ;
Jones, Patricia ;
Dowie, Jack .
EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOSTATISTICS AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 10 (03)
[7]   Young People with Intellectual Disability Transitioning to Adulthood: Do Behaviour Trajectories Differ in Those with and without Down Syndrome? [J].
Foley, Kitty-Rose ;
Taffe, John ;
Bourke, Jenny ;
Einfeld, Stewart L. ;
Tonge, Bruce J. ;
Trollor, Julian ;
Leonard, Helen .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (07)
[8]   Reconsidering prenatal screening: an empirical-ethical approach to understand moral dilemmas as a question of personal preferences [J].
Garcia, E. ;
Timmermans, D. R. M. ;
van Leeuwen, E. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2009, 35 (07) :410-414
[9]   The impact of ethical beliefs on decisions about prenatal screening tests:: Searching for justification [J].
Garcia, Elisa ;
Timmermans, Danielle R. M. ;
van Leeuwene, Evert .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2008, 66 (03) :753-764
[10]   Bioethical concepts in theory and practice: an exploratory study of prenatal screening in Iceland [J].
Gottfreosdottir, Helga ;
Arnason, Vilhjalmur .
MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2011, 14 (01) :53-61