Laboratory Evaluation of Cuff Pressure Control Methods

被引:2
作者
Babic, Sherry A. [1 ]
Chatburn, Robert L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Resp Therapy Inst, M-56,9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
airway management; mechanical ventilation; endotracheal tube; cuff pressure regulators;
D O I
10.4187/respcare.06728
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Automatic cuff pressure (P-cuff) control devices for artificial airways are available, yet there are no standards or data to support their use. We hypothesized that airway pressure oscillations during mechanical ventilation are transmitted to P-cuff and that the change in mean P-cuff(Delta P-cuff) is zero during mechanical ventilation with controlled or uncontrolled P-cuff METHODS: Experiments lasted 12 h, and 2 inspiratory pressure targets (P-insp) were established. We tested 3 automatic devices (InteWenn' Standalone, PressureEyes, and Tracoe) and one manual method for uncontrolled P-cuff. We utilized a training mannequin with an 8-mm endotracheal tube to assess pressure-controlled continuous mechanical ventilation with the following parameters: breathing frequency = 20 breaths/min, T-1 = 1.0 s, PEEP = 10 cm H2O, and P-insp = 10 and 40 cm H2O. For automatic cuff pressure control, we used a data acquisition system. For manual cuff pressure control, P-cuff was set once and measured after mechanical ventilation. Initial P-cuff was 25 cm H2O, and Delta P-cuff was calculated as final mean P-cuff-initial mean P-cuff. Data for Delta P-cuff were compared with t tests and reported as mean (SD). RESULTS: Airway pressure oscillations during ventilation were observed in P euff waveforms. For manual control, Delta P-cuff was -9.3 (2.1) cm H2O for P-insp = 10 cm H2O and -8.1 (1.1) cm H2O for P-insp = 40 cm H2O (vs 0, P < .001). There was no difference in Delta P-cuff for P-insp = 10 cm H2O versus 40 cm H2O (P = .21). Delta P-cuff was only +/- 0.3 cm H2O for automatic control, which we deemed clinically unimportant. CONCLUSIONS: Automatic devices do not regulate ventilatory pressure oscillations, but they do control mean P-cuff and keep Delta P-cuff well below a clinically important threshold. The large Delta P-cuff seen with uncontrolled P-cuff warrants periodic monitoring. Further studies are needed to determine the source of Delta P-cuff and the physiologic effects of P-cuff oscillations during mechanical ventilation.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 67
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Endotracheal tube cuff pressure changes during manual cuff pressure control manoeuvres: An in-vitro assessment [J].
Aeppli, Norbert ;
Lindauer, Bastian ;
Steurer, Marc P. ;
Weiss, Markus ;
Dullenkopf, Alexander .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 63 (01) :55-60
[3]  
[Anonymous], J INTENSIVE CARE
[4]  
[Anonymous], J INTENSIVE CARE MED
[5]   A mathematical model of differential tracheal tube cuff pressure: Effects of diffusion and temperature [J].
Atlas G.M. .
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2005, 19 (6) :415-425
[6]   Automated control of endotracheal tube cuff pressure during simulated flight [J].
Blakeman, Thomas ;
Rodriquez, Dario, Jr. ;
Woods, James ;
Cox, Daniel ;
Elterman, Joel ;
Branson, Richard .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2016, 81 (05) :S116-S120
[7]  
Blanch Paul B, 2004, Respir Care, V49, P166
[8]   A Taxonomy for Mechanical Ventilation: 10 Fundamental Maxims [J].
Chatburn, Robert L. ;
El-Khatib, Mohamad ;
Mireles-Cabodevila, Eduardo .
RESPIRATORY CARE, 2014, 59 (11) :1747-1763
[9]   Evaluation of an Automated Endotracheal Tube Cuff Controller During Simulated Mechanical Ventilation [J].
Chenelle, Christopher T. ;
Oto, Jun ;
Sulemanji, Demet ;
Fisher, Daniel F. ;
Kacmarek, Robert M. .
RESPIRATORY CARE, 2015, 60 (02) :183-190
[10]  
Hess Dean R, 2005, Respir Care, V50, P497