The Ideology of Homicide Detectives: A Cross-National Study

被引:5
作者
Reasons, Charles E. [1 ]
Francis, Teresa [1 ]
Kim, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent Washington Univ, Dept Law & Justice, Ellensburg, WA 98926 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
关键词
comparative homicide; ideology; homicide detectives; causes of homicide; police work; INEQUALITY; RATES;
D O I
10.1177/1088767910381864
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Ideologies help guide our behavior and thought processes and have been largely neglected when studying crime and criminal justice professionals. Intensive interviews were conducted with homicide detectives in Seattle, Washington and Vancouver, British Columbia to provide a view of their working beliefs and opinions concerning a number of issues. The areas questioned included (a) working environment, (b) causes of homicide, (c) television portrayal of homicide work, and (d) the death penalty. Within each area several questions were asked. Although homicide detectives in both cities and countries gave similar responses to many questions, they differed significantly in terms of the role of guns, particularly handguns, in homicide rates, the death penalty, and their relationship to the prosecutor/crown. Therefore, although their constellation of beliefs (ideologies) surrounding the above noted topics were in many ways similar, there were distinct differences. The areas of difference can be understood within the larger legal and cultural context.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 452
页数:17
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], HOMICIDE STUDIES
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1927, GANG
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, MEDIA CRIME CRIMINAL
  • [4] Economic inequality, legitimacy, and cross-national homicide rates
    Chamlin, Mitchell B.
    Cochran, John K.
    [J]. HOMICIDE STUDIES, 2006, 10 (04) : 231 - 252
  • [5] Daly M, 2001, CAN J CRIMINOL, V43, P219
  • [6] Dandurand Yvon., 1998, FIREARMS ACCIDENTAL
  • [7] Erickson Richard V., 1981, Making Crime: A Study of Detective Work
  • [8] KAPPELER VF, 2005, MYTHOLOGY CRIME CRIM, V4
  • [9] Kelleher M. J., 2001, AM SOCIOL, P70
  • [10] LIAZOS A, 1972, SOC PROBL, V20, P102