Aesthetic Judgement from the Perspective of Aesthetic Meta-Relativism

被引：0
作者：
Zahradka, Pavel [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Palackeho, Filozof Fak, Olomouc, Czech Republic
来源：
FILOSOFICKY CASOPIS | 2016年 / 64卷 / 03期
关键词：
aesthetic judgement; relativism; objectivism; non-cognitivism; faultless disagreement; thick concepts; REALISM;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
B82 [伦理学（道德学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
In this text I will present a critical analysis of three philosophical approaches to the epistemological problematic of the validity of aesthetic judgement: aesthetic objectivism, aesthetic relativism and aesthetic scepticism. I will compare the individival theoretical positions and critically analyse them firstly as regards their compatibility with basic intuitions about aesthetic judgement, and secondly as regards the logico-semantic analysis of aesthetic concepts. In the concluding part of the text, I will argue in favour of the position of aesthetic meta-relativisim and I will examine the practical consequences which follow from this position for the conduct of aesthetic disputes.
引用
收藏
页码：367 / 386
页数：20
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Ayer A.J., 1971, LANGUAGE TRUTH LOGIC
  • [2] Sensitivity, sensibility, and aesthetic realism
    Bender, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS AND ART CRITICISM, 2001, 59 (01) : 73 - 83
  • [3] Carnap Rudolf., 1967, The Logical Foundations of Probability, V2nd
  • [4] Carroll N., 2009, ON CRITICISM
  • [5] COHEN T, 1973, THEORIA, V39, P113
  • [6] Compton ElizabethAshley Zeron., 2012, A Dispositional Account of Aesthetic Properties (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3516527)
  • [7] Dadejik O, 2013, ESTETIKA, V50, P206
  • [8] Davidson Donald., 2001, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE, V47, P183
  • [9] Egan Andy., 2010, DISAGREEMENT, P247, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199226078.003.0011
  • [10] Goldman A. H., 1988, AESTHETIC VALUE
123