ENTERIC METHANE EMISSIONS OF BEEF COWS GRAZING TALLGRASS PRAIRIE PASTURE ON THE SOUTHERN GREAT PLAINS

被引:3
|
作者
Todd, R. W. [1 ]
Moffet, C. [2 ]
Neel, J. P. S. [3 ]
Turner, K. E. [3 ]
Steiner, J. L. [3 ]
Cole, N. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Conservat & Prod Res Lab, PO Drawer 10, Bushland, TX 79012 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Southern Plains Range Res Stn, Woodward, OK USA
[3] USDA ARS, Grazinglands Res Lab, El Reno, OK USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Beef cows; Enteric methane; Forage quality; Grazing; Tallgrass prairie; GREENHOUSE-GAS; DAIRY-COWS; CATTLE; RYEGRASS; TRACER; FRESH;
D O I
10.13031/trans.13341
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Methane (CH4) is an important greenhouse gas, and about 20% of the carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) greenhouse gases emitted by U.S. agriculture are attributed to enteric CH4 produced by grazing beef cattle. Grazing cattle are mobile point sources of methane and present challenges to quantifying the enteric methane emission rate (MER). In this study, we applied three methods to measure herd-scale and individual-animal MER for a herd of beef cows grazing a native tallgrass prairie: a point source method that used forward-mode dispersion analysis and open-path lasers and cow locations, an open chamber breath analysis system (GreenFeed), and an eddy covariance ratio method that used the ratio of CH4 and CO2 mass fluxes. Three campaigns were conducted during the early season (July), late season (October), and dormant season (February). The point source and GreenFeed methods yielded similar MER (. SD) values during the early season campaign: 0.38 +/- 0.04 and 0.34 +/- 0.05 kg d(-1) cow(-1), respectively. However, the MER values from the two methods diverged in subsequent seasons. The GreenFeed MER decreased through the late and dormant seasons to 0.23 +/- 0.03 and 0.19 +/- 0.03 kg d(-1) cow(-1), respectively. In contrast, the point source MER stayed the same during the late season and increased during the dormant season to 0.41 +/- 0.07 kg d(-1) cow(-1). The CH4:CO2 ratio method, which was used only during the dormant season, yielded a MER of 0.29 +/- 0.05 kg d(-1) cow(-1). The point source and GreenFeed methods measured different MER (integrated herd-scale versus a subset of individual animals) and likely sampled methane emissions at different times during the day. We conclude that the point source method tended to overestimate emissions, and the GreenFeed method tended to underestimate emissions. Enteric methane emissions from beef cows over the three grazing seasons averaged 0.39 and 0.25 kg d(-1) cow(-1) as measured by the point source and GreenFeed methods, respectively. An annualized enteric MER for a beef cow herd grazing tallgrass prairie was 0.32 kg d(-1) cow(-1). Quantifying enteric methane emissions from grazing beef cows remains a challenge because of the mobile, often dispersed behavior of grazing cattle and the dynamic interactions of forage quality, dry matter intake, and changing physiological state of cows during the year.
引用
收藏
页码:1455 / 1465
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] STEP-UP PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTATION FOR BEEF-COWS GRAZING DORMANT, TALLGRASS PRAIRIE
    VANZANT, ES
    COCHRAN, RC
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1993, 6 (02): : 236 - 240
  • [2] A comparison of native tallgrass prairie and plains bluestem forage systems for cow-calf production in the Southern Great Plains
    Coleman, SW
    Phillips, WA
    Volesky, JD
    Buchanan, D
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2001, 79 (07) : 1697 - 1705
  • [3] Milk production and enteric methane emissions by dairy cows grazing fertilized perennial ryegrass pasture with or without inclusion of white clover
    Enriquez-Hidalgo, D.
    Gilliland, T.
    Deighton, M. H.
    O'Donovan, M.
    Hennessy, D.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2014, 97 (03) : 1400 - 1412
  • [4] Effect of supplementation frequency and supplemental urea level on dormant tallgrass-prairie hay intake and digestion by beef steers and prepartum performance of beef cows grazing dormant tallgrass-prairie
    Farmer, CG
    Woods, BC
    Cochran, RC
    Heldt, JS
    Mathis, CP
    Olson, KC
    Titgemeyer, EC
    Wickersham, TA
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2004, 82 (03) : 884 - 894
  • [5] Effect of frame size and season on enteric methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in Angus brood cows grazing native tallgrass prairie in central Oklahoma
    Neel, J. P. S.
    Turner, K. E.
    Gowda, P. H.
    Steiner, J. L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 293 - 293
  • [6] Methane emissions by Charolais cows grazing a monospecific pasture of timothy at four stages of maturity
    Pinares-Patiño, CS
    Baumont, R
    Martin, C
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2003, 83 (04) : 769 - 777
  • [7] Effect of dietary nitrate on enteric methane emissions, production performance and rumen fermentation of dairy cows grazing ryegrass pasture during spring
    van Wyngaard, J. D. V.
    Meeske, R.
    Erasmus, L. J.
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 252 : 64 - 73
  • [8] Effects of concentrate supplementation on enteric methane emissions and milk production of grazing dairy cows
    Munoz, Camila
    Hube, Sara
    Morales, Jorge M.
    Yan, Tianhai
    Ungerfeld, Emilio M.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2015, 175 : 37 - 46
  • [9] Evaluating enteric methane emissions within a herd of genetically divergent grazing dairy cows
    Lahart, B.
    Buckley, F.
    Herron, J.
    Fitzgerald, R.
    Fitzpatrick, E.
    Galvin, N.
    Shalloo, L.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2024, 107 (01) : 383 - 397
  • [10] Enteric methane emissions in grazing dairy systems
    Soder, Kathy J.
    Brito, Andre F.
    JDS COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 4 (04):