Gas exchange in Paulownia species growing under different soil moisture conditions in the field

被引:0
|
作者
Llano-Sotelo, J. M. [1 ]
Alcaraz-Melendez, L. [1 ]
Castellanos Villegas, A. E. [2 ]
机构
[1] CIBNOR, La Paz 23000, Bcs, Mexico
[2] Univ Sonora, Dept Invest Cient & Tecnol, Hermosillo 83000, Sonora, Mexico
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY | 2010年 / 31卷 / 04期
关键词
Paulownia; Drought; Photosynthesis; Gas exchange; Stomatal conductance; WATER RELATIONS; WOODY ANGIOSPERMS; USE EFFICIENCY; DRY FOREST; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SEEDLINGS; STRESS; NUTRIENT; HAWAII;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In order to evaluate their responses to drought, we determined the photosynthetic activity water potential, stomatal conductance, transpiration, water use efficiency, photosynthetic photon flux density and leaf temperature of Paulownia imperialis, P. fortunei and P elongata in three different soil moisture conditions in the field. Our results showed that P imperialis had greater photosynthesis (8.86 mu mol CO2 m(-2) s(-1)) and instantaneous water use efficiency (0.79 mu mol CO2 mmol H2O-1) than either P elongate (8.20 mu mol CO2 m(-2) s(-1) and 0.71 mu mol CO2 mmol H2O-1) or P fortunei (3.26 mu mol CO2 m(-2) s(-1) and 0.07 mu mol CO(2)mmol H2O-1), The rapid growth of Paulownia did not appear to be correlated with photosynthetic rates. Paulownia fortunei showed more transpiration (48.78 mmol H2O m(-2) s(-1)) and stomatal conductance (840 mmol m(-2) s(-1)) than P imperialis (20 mmol H2O m(-2) s(-1) and 540 mmol m(-2) s(-1)) and P elongata (20 mmol H2O m(-2) s(-1) and 410 mmol m(-2) s(-1)), which allowed these two Paulownia species to increase their tolerance to low soil moisture, and maintain higher water use efficiency under these conditions. According to our physiological gas exchange field tests, Paulownia imperialis does appear to be capable of successful growth in semiarid zones.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 502
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] GAS-EXCHANGE RESPONSES OF CHESAPEAKE BAY TIDAL MARSH SPECIES UNDER FIELD AND LABORATORY CONDITIONS
    DEJONG, TM
    DRAKE, BG
    PEARCY, RW
    OECOLOGIA, 1982, 52 (01) : 5 - 11
  • [32] Gas exchange of four woody species under salinity and soil waterlogging
    Lima, Alan D.
    Sousa, Carlos H. C.
    de Lacerda, Claudivan F.
    Bezerra, Marlos A.
    Silva, Evandro N.
    Neves, Antonia L. R.
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA E AMBIENTAL, 2017, 21 (10): : 670 - 674
  • [33] Soil organic carbon cycling in response to simulated soil moisture variation under field conditions
    Singh, Shikha
    Mayes, Melanie A.
    Shekoofa, Avat
    Kivlin, Stephanie N.
    Bansal, Sangeeta
    Jagadamma, Sindhu
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [34] Predicting soil moisture status and suitable field workdays under tropical conditions
    Simalenga, T.E.
    Have, H.
    AMA, Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, 1994, 25 (03): : 9 - 12
  • [35] Comparison of four soil moisture sensor types under field conditions in Switzerland
    Mittelbach, Heidi
    Lehner, Irene
    Seneviratne, Sonia I.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2012, 430 : 39 - 49
  • [36] Soil organic carbon cycling in response to simulated soil moisture variation under field conditions
    Shikha Singh
    Melanie A. Mayes
    Avat Shekoofa
    Stephanie N. Kivlin
    Sangeeta Bansal
    Sindhu Jagadamma
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [38] Profile Soil Moisture Across Spatial Scales Under Different Hydroclimatic Conditions
    Das, Narendra N.
    Mohanty, Binayak P.
    Njoku, Eni G.
    SOIL SCIENCE, 2010, 175 (07) : 315 - 319
  • [39] Bioactivity of Several Herbicides on the Nanogram Level Under Different Soil Moisture Conditions
    Jung, S. C.
    Kuk, Y. I.
    Senseman, S. A.
    Ahn, H. G.
    Seong, C. N.
    Lee, D. J.
    JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 15 (01) : 676 - 679
  • [40] Nitrogen Uptake and Utilization by No-Tillage Rice under Different Soil Moisture Conditions - A Model Study under Simulated Soil Conditions
    Yang, Cailing
    Xu, Shihong
    Liu, Lilong
    Huang, Min
    Zheng, Tuying
    Wei, Shanqing
    Zhang, Yu
    Deng, Guofu
    Jiang, Ligeng
    PLANT PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2015, 18 (02) : 118 - 127