Treatment options for autoimmune hepatitis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

被引:126
|
作者
Lamers, Mieke M. H. [1 ]
van Oijen, Martijn G. H. [1 ]
Pronk, Martine [2 ]
Drenth, Joost P. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Autoimmune; Hepatitis; Systematic review; CHRONIC ACTIVE HEPATITIS; LIVER-DISEASE; AZATHIOPRINE; PREDNISONE; MAINTENANCE; THERAPY; COMBINATION; REMISSION; CHALLENGES; WITHDRAWAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhep.2010.01.037
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: Predniso(lo)ne with or without azathioprine is considered the mainstay in the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), but many therapeutic options are available. The primary objective of this review was to explore the published literature on the optimal induction and subsequent maintenance therapy for AIH. Methods: We performed a systematic search on electronic databases MEDLINE (1950-07.2009), Web of Science, Cochrane, and the website www.clinicaltrials.gov. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on apparent beneficial treatment regimens as induction or maintenance treatment in AIH were included. Pediatric studies were excluded. We calculated relative risks (RR) for comparison of treatment options on the primary outcome measure, which was defined as clinical, biochemical and histological remission. Results: Eleven RCTs were included, of which 7 studies evaluated the induction therapy in AIH patients: 3 treatment naive (n = 253), 2 relapse (n = 53), 2 combination of naive and relapse (n = 110). The remaining 4 studies (n = 162) assessed maintenance therapy. All but one maintenance study (thymostimulin versus no therapy) studied predniso(lo)ne (PRED), azathioprine (AZA) or combination PRED + AZA. We found no differences in primary outcome between induction therapy with PRED and PRED + AZA in treatment naive patients (RR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.65-1.47). AZA monotherapy as induction was considered as not viable because of a high mortality rate (30%). This was similar in AIH patients who relapsed: RR for PRED versus PRED + AZA for inducing remission was not different: 0.71 (95% CI 0.37-1.39). PRED + AZA maintained remission more often than PRED (RR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.13-1.73). Also AZA maintained a higher remission rate than PRED (RR = 1.35; 95% CI 1.07-1.70). Maintenance of remission was not different between PRED + AZA and AZA (RR = 1.06; 95% CI 0.941.20). Conclusions: Based on available RCTs, PRED monotherapy and PRED + AZA combination therapy are both viable induction therapies for AIH treatment naives and relapsers, while for maintenance therapy PRED + AZA and AZA therapy are superior to PRED monotherapy. (C) 2010 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 198
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Budesonide as a first line therapy in autoimmune hepatitis: A systematic review
    Ajwah, Ibrahim Mahmoud
    Albalawi, Mohammed Abdullah
    Alenazi, Bashayer Jazza
    Alamri, Saif Mohammed
    Qubays, Faris Essa
    Ajwah, Abdullah Mahmoud
    Alghamdi, Abdullah Saeed
    Alanazi, Nader Awad
    Asseri, Abdul Wahab Ali
    Algamdi, Kholoud Abdullah
    Alenezi, Solaiman Hosaian
    Makai, Ahmad Jamil
    Amer, Mohamed Omar
    AUSTRALASIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 13 (06): : 207 - 212
  • [42] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Xingnaojing Treatment for Stroke
    Peng, Weijun
    Yang, Jingjing
    Wang, Yang
    Wang, Weihao
    Xu, Jianxia
    Wang, Lexing
    Xing, Zhihua
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 2014
  • [43] The efficacy of thymosin α1 as immunomodulatory treatment for sepsis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Liu, Fang
    Wang, Hong-Mei
    Wang, Tiansheng
    Zhang, Ya-Mei
    Zhu, Xi
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 16
  • [44] The effects of acceptance and commitment therapy in psychosis treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Yildiz, Erman
    PERSPECTIVES IN PSYCHIATRIC CARE, 2020, 56 (01) : 149 - 167
  • [45] Systematic review of randomized controlled trials in the treatment of dry eye disease in Sjogren syndrome
    Shih, Kendrick Co
    Lun, Christie Nicole
    Jhanji, Vishal
    Thong, Bernard Yu-Hor
    Tong, Louis
    JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATION-LONDON, 2017, 14
  • [46] Non-pharmacological treatment of gambling disorder: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Ribeiro, Eliana O.
    Afonso, Nuno H.
    Morgado, Pedro
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [47] Efficacy of occlusal splints in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Si-Hui
    He, Kai-Xun
    Lin, Chen-Jing
    Liu, Xiang-Dong
    Wu, Ling
    Chen, Jiang
    Rausch-Fan, Xiaohui
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2020, 78 (08) : 580 - 589
  • [48] Melatonin in the treatment of cancer: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis
    Mills, E
    Wu, P
    Seely, D
    Guyatt, G
    JOURNAL OF PINEAL RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (04) : 360 - 366
  • [49] Non-pharmacological treatment of gambling disorder: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Eliana O. Ribeiro
    Nuno H. Afonso
    Pedro Morgado
    BMC Psychiatry, 21
  • [50] Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in treatment of Takayasu arteritis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Singh, Ambrish
    Danda, Debashish
    Hussain, Salman
    Najmi, Abul Kalam
    Mathew, Ashish
    Goel, Ruchika
    Lakhan, Shaheen E.
    Tajudheen, Belzik
    Antony, Benny
    MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 31 (01) : 197 - 204