Treatment options for autoimmune hepatitis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

被引:126
|
作者
Lamers, Mieke M. H. [1 ]
van Oijen, Martijn G. H. [1 ]
Pronk, Martine [2 ]
Drenth, Joost P. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Autoimmune; Hepatitis; Systematic review; CHRONIC ACTIVE HEPATITIS; LIVER-DISEASE; AZATHIOPRINE; PREDNISONE; MAINTENANCE; THERAPY; COMBINATION; REMISSION; CHALLENGES; WITHDRAWAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhep.2010.01.037
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: Predniso(lo)ne with or without azathioprine is considered the mainstay in the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), but many therapeutic options are available. The primary objective of this review was to explore the published literature on the optimal induction and subsequent maintenance therapy for AIH. Methods: We performed a systematic search on electronic databases MEDLINE (1950-07.2009), Web of Science, Cochrane, and the website www.clinicaltrials.gov. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on apparent beneficial treatment regimens as induction or maintenance treatment in AIH were included. Pediatric studies were excluded. We calculated relative risks (RR) for comparison of treatment options on the primary outcome measure, which was defined as clinical, biochemical and histological remission. Results: Eleven RCTs were included, of which 7 studies evaluated the induction therapy in AIH patients: 3 treatment naive (n = 253), 2 relapse (n = 53), 2 combination of naive and relapse (n = 110). The remaining 4 studies (n = 162) assessed maintenance therapy. All but one maintenance study (thymostimulin versus no therapy) studied predniso(lo)ne (PRED), azathioprine (AZA) or combination PRED + AZA. We found no differences in primary outcome between induction therapy with PRED and PRED + AZA in treatment naive patients (RR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.65-1.47). AZA monotherapy as induction was considered as not viable because of a high mortality rate (30%). This was similar in AIH patients who relapsed: RR for PRED versus PRED + AZA for inducing remission was not different: 0.71 (95% CI 0.37-1.39). PRED + AZA maintained remission more often than PRED (RR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.13-1.73). Also AZA maintained a higher remission rate than PRED (RR = 1.35; 95% CI 1.07-1.70). Maintenance of remission was not different between PRED + AZA and AZA (RR = 1.06; 95% CI 0.941.20). Conclusions: Based on available RCTs, PRED monotherapy and PRED + AZA combination therapy are both viable induction therapies for AIH treatment naives and relapsers, while for maintenance therapy PRED + AZA and AZA therapy are superior to PRED monotherapy. (C) 2010 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 198
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Oral Oxymatrine Preparation for Chronic Hepatitis B:A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    宋威江
    罗静
    吴桐
    姚树坤
    Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2016, 22 (02) : 141 - 149
  • [22] The Effectiveness of Nonoperative Treatment Modalities in the Management of Frozen Shoulder: a Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Albishi, W.
    Murad, K.
    Alaseem, A.
    Awwad, W.
    Alsanawi, H.
    MLTJ-MUSCLES LIGAMENTS AND TENDONS JOURNAL, 2022, 12 (02): : 104 - 114
  • [23] Lenalidomide Treatment for Multiple Myeloma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Yang, Bo
    Yu, Rui-li
    Chi, Xiao-hua
    Lu, Xue-chun
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (05):
  • [24] Cannabinoids in the Treatment of Cannabis Use Disorder: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Vuilleumier, Caroline
    Scherbaum, Norbert
    Bonnet, Udo
    Roser, Patrik
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13
  • [25] Efficacy of gabapentin in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Ta, Patrick Chieu Poa
    Hue Quyen Dinh
    Nguyen, Kim
    Lin, Samuel
    Ong, Yong Li
    Ariyawardana, Anura
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2019, 10 (04) : e12448
  • [26] Clinical significance in pediatric oncology randomized controlled treatment trials: a systematic review
    Howard, A. Fuchsia
    Goddard, Karen
    Rassekh, Shahrad Rod
    Samargandi, Osama A.
    Hasan, Haroon
    TRIALS, 2018, 19
  • [27] Acupuncture for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: A protocol for the systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Kim, Jong-In
    Kim, Hee-Jung
    Lee, Jung Ju
    Jun, Ji Hee
    Choi, Tae-Young
    Lee, Myeong Soo
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (11)
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of iguratimod in the treatment of rheumatic and autoimmune diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review of 84 randomized controlled trials
    Zeng, Liuting
    He, Qi
    Deng, Ying
    Li, Yuwei
    Chen, Junpeng
    Yang, Kailin
    Luo, Yanfang
    Ge, Anqi
    Zhu, Xiaofei
    Long, Zhiyong
    Sun, Lingyun
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [29] Traditional needle acupuncture treatment for insomnia: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Yeung, Wing-Fai
    Chung, Ka-Fai
    Leung, Yau-Kwong
    Zhang, Shi-Ping
    Law, Andrew C. K.
    SLEEP MEDICINE, 2009, 10 (07) : 694 - 704
  • [30] Antiviral treatment for treatment-naive chronic hepatitis B: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wong, William W. L.
    Pechivanoglou, Petros
    Wong, Josephine
    Bielecki, Joanna M.
    Haines, Alex
    Erman, Aysegul
    Saeed, Yasmin
    Phoon, Arcturus
    Tadrous, Mina
    Younis, Mona
    Rayad, Noha Z.
    Rac, Valeria
    Janssen, Harry L. A.
    Krahn, Murray D.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (01)