Sexual Violence Legislation: A Review of Case Law and Empirical Research

被引:16
作者
Calkins, Cynthia [1 ]
Jeglic, Elizabeth [1 ]
Beattey, Robert A. [1 ,2 ]
Zeidman, Steve [3 ]
Perillo, Anthony D. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] CUNY John Jay Coll Criminal Justice, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10075 USA
[2] CUNY, Grad Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] CUNY, Sch Law, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] CUNY John Jay Coll Criminal Justice, New York, NY 10075 USA
关键词
sex crime; sexual offense; offending; OFFENDER RESIDENCE RESTRICTIONS; COMMUNITY NOTIFICATION; CIVIL COMMITMENT; FAMILY-MEMBERS; PREDATOR LAWS; RISK PROFILES; IMPACT; REGISTRATION; PROXIMITY; STATE;
D O I
10.1037/law0000027
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Sexual violence is a serious problem that affects those victimized, their families, and the community around them. Much sex offense legislation appears designed to respond to the collective fear that sexual violence engenders, with legislative efforts (intentionally or unintentionally) tending to target low-base-rate "stranger danger" types of offenses. This article reviews prevailing forms of sex offense legislation, providing a summary of recent case law and an examination of empirical findings that bear upon the functioning and impact of common legislative responses to these "stranger danger" fears, including sexually violent predator laws, registration and community notification statutes, residence restrictions, and electronic monitoring. Although it is difficult to conduct well-controlled studies that test whether sex offense legislation works, extant research provides, at most, limited support for the value of much current legislation. This article concludes by suggesting areas of research need and outlining how empirical data may help to shape sex offense legislation so as to most successfully reduce sexual violence.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 462
页数:20
相关论文
共 116 条
[41]  
Gies S.V., 2012, Monitoring high-risk sex offenders with GPS technology: An evaluation of the California supervision program
[42]  
Gookin K., 2007, 07081101 WASH I PUBL
[43]  
Gowen D, 2001, FED PROBAT, V65, P38
[44]  
Hanson R. K., 2003, PROTECTING SOC SEXUA, P265
[45]  
Hanson R. K., 2004, 200402 PUBL SAF EM P
[46]   Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales [J].
Hanson, RK ;
Thornton, D .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2000, 24 (01) :119-136
[47]   Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies [J].
Hanson, RK ;
Bussiere, MT .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 66 (02) :348-362
[48]   Specialization and versatility in sexual offenders referred for civil commitment [J].
Harris, Danielle A. ;
Smallbone, Stephen ;
Dennison, Susan ;
Knight, Raymond A. .
JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2009, 37 (01) :37-44
[49]  
Hynes K., 2013, Penn State Journal of Law and International Affairs, V2, P351
[50]   Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: A survey of experts [J].
Jackson, Rebecca L. ;
Hess, Derek T. .
SEXUAL ABUSE-A JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2007, 19 (04) :425-448