Control and Interference in Task Switching-A Review

被引:1188
作者
Kiesel, Andrea [1 ]
Steinhauser, Marco [3 ]
Wendt, Mike [5 ,6 ]
Falkenstein, Michael [2 ]
Jost, Kerstin [4 ]
Philipp, Andrea M. [6 ]
Koch, Iring [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Psychol, D-97070 Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Univ Konstanz, Dept Psychol, Constance, Germany
[3] Helmut Schmidt Univ, Expt Psychol Unit, Hamburg, Germany
[4] TU Dortmund, Leibniz Res Ctr Working Environm & Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany
[5] Univ Marburg, Dept Psychol, D-3550 Marburg, Germany
[6] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Dept Psychol, Aachen, Germany
关键词
task switching; cognitive control; interference; EXECUTIVE COGNITIVE-PROCESSES; BILINGUAL SPEECH PRODUCTION; ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; INFERIOR FRONTAL JUNCTION; CHOICE-REACTION-TIME; RESPONSE SELECTION; SET SELECTION; MIXING COSTS; ARTICULATORY SUPPRESSION; COMPUTATIONAL THEORY;
D O I
10.1037/a0019842
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The task-switching paradigm offers enormous possibilities to study cognitive control as well as task interference. The current review provides an overview of recent research on both topics. First, we review different experimental approaches to task switching, such as comparing mixed-task blocks with single-task blocks, predictable task-switching and task-cuing paradigms, intermittent instructions, and voluntary task selection. In the 2nd part, we discuss findings on preparatory control mechanisms in task switching and theoretical accounts of task preparation. We consider preparation processes in two-stage models, consider preparation as an all-or-none process, address the question of whether preparation is switch-specific, reflect on preparation as interaction of cue encoding and memory retrieval, and discuss the impact of verbal mediation on preparation. In the 3rd part, we turn to interference phenomena in task switching. We consider proactive interference of tasks and inhibition of recently performed tasks indicated by asymmetrical switch costs and n-2 task-repetition costs. We discuss stimulus-based interference as a result of stimulus-based response activation and stimulus-based task activation, and response-based interference because of applying bivalent rather than univalent responses, response repetition effects, and carryover of response selection and execution. In the 4th and final part, we mention possible future research fields.
引用
收藏
页码:849 / 874
页数:26
相关论文
共 211 条
[1]  
ACH N, 2006, WILLEN
[2]  
ALLPORT A, 1994, ATTENTION PERFORM, V15, P421
[3]  
Allport A, 2000, CONTROL OF COGNITIVE PROCESSES: ATTENTION AND PERFORMANCE XVIII, P35
[4]  
Allport A., 1999, ATTENTION SPACE ACTI, P273
[5]   Repetition priming in task switching: Do the benefits dissipate? [J].
Altmann, EM .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2005, 12 (03) :535-540
[6]   The preparation effect in task switching: Carryover of SOA [J].
Altmann, EM .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2004, 32 (01) :153-163
[7]   Forgetting to remember: The functional relationship of decay and interference [J].
Altmann, EM ;
Gray, WD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (01) :27-33
[8]   Functional decay of memory for tasks [J].
Altmann, EM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2002, 66 (04) :287-297
[9]   An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching [J].
Altmann, Erik M. ;
Gray, Wayne D. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2008, 115 (03) :602-639
[10]   Comparing switch costs: Alternating runs and explicit cuing [J].
Altmann, Erik M. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2007, 33 (03) :475-483