Feminist trends in distance and hybrid higher education: a scoping review

被引:5
作者
Jimenez-Cortes, Rocio [1 ]
Aires, Luisa [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, Fac Educ Sci, Dept Res Methods & Diag Educ, Seville, Spain
[2] Univ Aberta, Dept Educ & Distance Learning DEED, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Distance education; Hybrid education; Feminist approaches; Scoping review; Higher education; TRANSACTIONAL DISTANCE; PEDAGOGY; ONLINE; GENDER;
D O I
10.1186/s41239-021-00297-4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Higher distance education models can be described from the theoretical and practical foundation of feminist pedagogy. The objective of this work is to know what feminist approaches are identified in the pedagogical models adopted by distance and hybrid education at the University and what curricular characteristics they have. The scoping review is carried out on a total of 126 journals bringing together 60 indexed, 30 specialized in gender and 6 in education. The final sample is made up of 10 papers that meet the established inclusion criteria. The review method is based on three phases of collection, description, and analysis with different tasks and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) protocol is followed. The results obtained from mixed methodology applied show three perspectives that set trends in distance and hybrid higher education models from feminist approaches: (a) feminist-pragmatist, (b) eco-dialogical feminist and (c) intersectional-technofeminist. These trends show the application of feminist principles to curriculum design and their implementation in distance and hybrid higher education.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Afolayan F. O., 2015, International Women Online Journal of Distance Education, V4, P14
[2]  
Amin S., 2020, INT RES J ED INNOVAT, V1, P43
[3]  
Anbalagan G, 2018, BONFRING INT J IND E, V3, P107
[4]   Blending in: reconciling feminist pedagogy and distance education across cultures [J].
Aneja, Anu .
GENDER AND EDUCATION, 2017, 29 (07) :850-868
[5]  
Bates A.W., 2020, Online Learning and Distance Education Resources
[6]  
Beatty B J., 2019, Values and Principles of Hybrid-Flexible Course Design, DOI DOI 10.59668/33
[7]  
Binnewies S., 2019, Blended learning designs in STEM higher education, P209, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-6982-7_12
[8]   Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review [J].
Boelens, Ruth ;
De Wever, Bram ;
Voet, Michiel .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2017, 22 :1-18
[9]   Online student perceptions of engagement, transactional distance, and outcomes [J].
Bolliger, Doris U. ;
Halupa, Colleen .
DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2018, 39 (03) :299-316
[10]  
Bontly S., 2017, P SOC INF TECHN TEAC, P383