The gender gap in highly prestigious international research awards, 2001-2020

被引:59
作者
Meho, Lokman, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Univ Lib, POB 11-0236, Beirut 11072020, Lebanon
来源
QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES | 2021年 / 2卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
awards; gender disparity; gender gap; prizes; women in engineering; women in science; CAREERS; SCIENCE; WOMEN; PIPELINE; PRIZES; STEM;
D O I
10.1162/qss_a_00148
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
This study examines gender disparities in the world's 141 most prestigious international research awards. I find that (a) from 2001 to 2020 these awards were received 3,445 times by 2,011 men and 262 women; (b) women's share increased from an annual average of 6% during 2001-2005 to an annual average of 19% during 2016-2020; (c) 49 of the 141 awards were not received by women during 2016-2020; and (d) when the numbers of female full professors are taken into consideration, the gender gap remains highly disproportionate in biological and life sciences, computer science, and mathematics. Overall, women would be expected to increase their share of awards by nearly 50% to achieve parity with men today. The study shows great similarities between men and women award recipients in journal articles per author, the average number of authors per article, the proportion of articles in top journals, citations per article, and participation in large research groups and international collaborations. I conclude that the gender gap in highly prestigious research awards is largely a result of demographic inertia and other factors that deserve further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:976 / 989
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gender Productivity Gap Among Star Performers in STEM and Other Scientific Fields
    Aguinis, Herman
    Ji, Young Hun
    Joo, Harry
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 103 (12) : 1283 - 1306
  • [2] Gender variations in citation distribution in medicine are very small and due to self-citation and journal prestige
    Andersen, Jens Peter
    Schneider, Jesper Wiborg
    Jagsi, Reshma
    Nielsen, Mathias Wullum
    [J]. ELIFE, 2019, 8
  • [3] Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review
    Astegiano, Julia
    Sebastian-Gonzalez, Esther
    Castanho, Camila de Toledo
    [J]. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2019, 6 (06):
  • [4] Matthew: Effect or Fable?
    Azoulay, Pierre
    Stuart, Toby
    Wang, Yanbo
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2014, 60 (01) : 92 - 109
  • [5] The age at which Noble Prize research is conducted
    Bjork, R.
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2019, 119 (02) : 931 - 939
  • [6] Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter?
    Blickenstaff, JC
    [J]. GENDER AND EDUCATION, 2005, 17 (04) : 369 - 386
  • [7] Cadwalader EL, 2014, ADV GEND RES, V19, P243, DOI 10.1108/S1529-212620140000019011
  • [8] Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape
    Ceci, Stephen J.
    Ginther, Donna K.
    Kahn, Shulamit
    Williams, Wendy M.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 2014, 15 (03) : 75 - 141
  • [9] Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science
    Ceci, Stephen J.
    Williams, Wendy M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (08) : 3157 - 3162
  • [10] Gender differences in performance of top cited scientists by field and country
    Chan, Ho Fai
    Torgler, Benno
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2020, 125 (03) : 2421 - 2447