600 km/h moving model rig for high-speed train aerodynamics

被引:31
作者
Yang, Ming-zhi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhong, Sha [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Lei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Qian, Bo-sen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Tian-tian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Dan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Fan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Traff & Transportat Engn, Key Lab Traff Safety Track, Minist Educ, Changsha 410075, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Joint Int Res Lab Key Technol Rail Traff Safety, Changsha 410075, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Natl & Local Joint Engn Res Ctr Safety Technol Ra, Changsha 410075, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Moving model rig; Maglev train; Aerodynamic; Experimental tests; Tunnel; SLIPSTREAM; FORCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jweia.2022.105063
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A maglev train with a speed of 600 km/h or higher can fill the speed gap between civil aircrafts and wheel rail trains to alleviate the contradiction between the existing transportation demand and actual transport capacity. However, the aerodynamic problems arising due to trains running at a higher speed threaten their safety and fuel efficiency. Therefore, we developed a newly moving model rig with a maximum speed of 680 km/h to evaluate aerodynamic performance of trains, thus determining the range of the aerodynamic design parameters. In the present work, a launch system with a mechanical efficiency of 68.1% was developed, and a structure of brake shoes with front and rear overlapping was designed to increase the friction. Additionally, a device to suppress the pressure disturbances generated by the compressed air, as well as a double track with the function of continuously adjusting the line spacing, were adopted. In repetitive experiments, the time histories of pressure curves for the same measuring point are in good agreement. Meanwhile, the moving model test and full-scale experimental result of maglev trains passing each other in open air are compared, with an error less than 4.6%, proving the repeatability and rationality of the proposed moving-model.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, JSME
[2]   Effects of an opening on pressure wave propagation in a tube [J].
Auvity, B ;
Bellenoue, M .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2005, 538 :269-289
[3]   The flow around high speed trains [J].
Baker, Chris .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2010, 98 (6-7) :277-298
[4]   Full-scale measurement and analysis of train slipstreams and wakes. Part 1: Ensemble averages [J].
Baker, Chris J. ;
Quinn, Andrew ;
Sima, Mikael ;
Hoefener, Lars ;
Licciardello, Ricardo .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART F-JOURNAL OF RAIL AND RAPID TRANSIT, 2014, 228 (05) :451-467
[5]   TRAIN AERODYNAMIC FORCES AND MOMENTS FROM MOVING MODEL EXPERIMENTS [J].
BAKER, CJ .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 1986, 24 (03) :227-251
[6]   Moving model analysis of the slipstream and wake of a high-speed train [J].
Bell, J. R. ;
Burton, D. ;
Thompson, M. C. ;
Herbst, A. H. ;
Sheridan, J. .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2015, 136 :127-137
[7]  
Bell J.R., 2018, AEROVEHICLES 3 3 INT
[8]  
Bellenoue M, 2002, NOTE N FL MECH MUL D, V79, P276
[9]  
Cen. European Standard, 2006, CEN EN 14067-5
[10]   Crosswind effects on the stability of a model passenger train-A comparison of static and moving experiments [J].
Dorigatti, F. ;
Sterling, M. ;
Baker, C. J. ;
Quinn, A. D. .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2015, 138 :36-51