Costs, benefits and ethics

被引：11

作者：

Sandler, Ronald ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Northeastern Univ, Dept Philosophy, 371 Holmes Hall, Boston, MA 02115 USA

来源：

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION | 2017年 / 1卷 / 04期

关键词：

EXTINCTION;

D O I：

10.1038/s41559-017-0105

中图分类号：

Q14 [生态学（生物生态学）];

学科分类号：

071012 ; 0713 ;

摘要：

Cost-benefit analysis suggests that the costs of de-extinction could imperil conservation of extant biodiversity in many cases. But there is also an ethical dimension to this debate that cannot be ignored.

引用

页数：2

共 10 条

[1]

Archer M., TEDX DEEXTINCTION

[2] Spending limited resources on de-extinction could lead to net biodiversity loss [J].

Bennett, Joseph R. ;

Maloney, Richard F. ;

Sleeves, Tammy E. ;

Brazill-Boast, James ;

Possingham, Hugh P. ;

Seddon, Philip J. .

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2017, 1 (04)

[3]

Brand S., TED

[4]

Brown S., 2016, VINEYARD GAZETT 0728

[5]

Greely H., TEDX DEEXTINCTION

[6] Is it right to reverse extinction? [J].

Minteer, Ben .

NATURE, 2014, 509 (7500) :261-261

[7]

Novak B. J., TEDX DEEXTINCTION

[8] The Ethics of Reviving Long Extinct Species [J].

Sandler, Ronald .

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2014, 28 (02) :354-360

[9] What If Extinction Is Not Forever? [J].

Sherkow, Jacob S. ;

Greely, Henry T. .

SCIENCE, 2013, 340 (6128) :32-33

[10]

Species Survival Commission, 2016, IUCN SSC GUID PRINC

← 1 →