Direct contact and air gap membrane distillation: Differences and similarities between lab and pilot scale

被引:84
作者
Eykens, L. [1 ,2 ]
Hitsov, I. [1 ,3 ]
De Sitter, K. [1 ]
Dotremont, C. [1 ]
Pinoy, L. [4 ]
Van der Bruggen, B. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] VITO Flemish Inst Technol Res, Boeretang 200, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Chem Engn, Celestijnenlaan 200F, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Fac Biosci Engn, Dept Math Modelling Stat & Bioinformat, BIOMATH, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Cluster Sustainable Chem Proc Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Gebroeders Desmetstr 1, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[5] Tshwane Univ Technol, Fac Engn & Built Environm, Private Bag X680, ZA-0001 Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
HYDROPHOBIC/HYDROPHILIC MEMBRANE; DESALINATION; WATER; MODEL; CONFIGURATIONS; DESIGN; MD;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2017.08.018
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Membrane distillation separates liquids and solutes using a hydrophobic microporous membrane. Different configurations have been investigated at lab scale, among which direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) and air gap membrane distillation (AGMD). Lab scale studies comparing different configurations show higher flux for DCMD, while AGMD is more energy efficient. However, no straightforward directions are given yet on how to translate these results to pilot scale. As membrane distillation is currently shifting from lab environment towards pilot experiments, a good understanding of pilot scale modules and the differences with lab modules are important. In this study, DCMD and AGMD were compared both at lab and pilot scale using the same membrane. At lab scale, it was found that the flux of DCMD is a factor 4 higher compared to the flux of AGMD. However, at pilot scale, the AGMD modules showed a higher flux and lower energy consumption compared to DCMD. As it is important for further upscaling of the technology, this study focusses on the explanation behind these unexpected higher fluxes of AGMD modules. Since the AGMD modules showed better performance and do not require an additional recuperating heat exchanger, this configuration is preferred over DCMD for larger scale applications.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 100
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Comparative study of direct-contact and air-gap membrane distillation processes [J].
Alklaibi, A. M. ;
Lior, Noam .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2007, 46 (02) :584-590
[2]   Comparison of various membrane distillation methods for desalination using hydrophobic ceramic membranes [J].
Cerneaux, Sophie ;
Struzynska, Izabela ;
Kujawski, Wojciech M. ;
Persin, Michel ;
Larbot, Andre .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2009, 337 (1-2) :55-60
[3]   Comparison of three membrane distillation configurations and seawater desalination by vacuum membrane distillation [J].
Chen Huayan ;
Wu Chunrui ;
Jia Yue ;
Wang Xuan ;
Lu Xiaolong .
DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2011, 28 (1-3) :321-327
[4]   Development of a Membrane Distillation module for solar energy seawater desalination [J].
Cipollina, A. ;
Di Sparti, M. G. ;
Tamburini, A. ;
Micale, G. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2012, 90 (12) :2101-2121
[5]   Experimental study of ammonia removal from water by membrane distillation (MD): The comparison of three configurations [J].
Ding, Zhongwei ;
Liu, Liying ;
Li, Zhaoman ;
Ma, Runyu ;
Yang, Zurong .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 286 (1-2) :93-103
[6]   A framework for better understanding membrane distillation separation process [J].
El-Bourawi, M. S. ;
Ding, Z. ;
Ma, R. ;
Khayet, M. .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 285 (1-2) :4-29
[7]   Application of a porous composite hydrophobic/hydrophilic membrane in desalination by air gap and liquid gap membrane distillation: A comparative study [J].
Essalhi, M. ;
Khayet, M. .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 133 :176-186
[8]   Surface segregation of fluorinated modifying macromolecule for hydrophobic/hydrophilic membrane preparation and application in air gap and direct contact membrane distillation [J].
Essalhi, M. ;
Khayet, M. .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2012, 417 :163-173
[9]   How to select a membrane distillation configuration? Process conditions and membrane influence unraveled [J].
Eykens, L. ;
Reyns, T. ;
De Sitter, K. ;
Dotremont, C. ;
Pinoy, L. ;
Van der Bruggen, B. .
DESALINATION, 2016, 399 :105-115
[10]   Characterization and performance evaluation of commercially available hydrophobic membranes for direct contact membrane distillation [J].
Eykens, L. ;
De Sitter, K. ;
Dotremont, C. ;
Pinoy, L. ;
Van der Bruggen, B. .
DESALINATION, 2016, 392 :63-73