共 6 条
Imaging surveillance for the detection of ipsilateral local tumor recurrence in patients who underwent oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery with acellular dermal matrix: abbreviated MRI versus conventional mammography and ultrasonography
被引:5
|作者:
Kim, Mi Young
[1
]
Suh, Young Jin
[2
]
An, Yeong Yi
[3
]
机构:
[1] Konkuk Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Div Breast & Thyroid Surg Oncol,St Vincents Hosp, Suwon, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, St Vincents Hosp, Suwon, South Korea
关键词:
Breast cancer;
Recurrence;
Surveillance;
Magnetic resonance imaging;
Breast-conserving surgery;
Acellular dermal matrix;
20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP;
HIGH-RISK;
PERSONAL HISTORY;
CANCER;
WOMEN;
RECONSTRUCTION;
MASTECTOMY;
VOLUME;
RECOMMENDATIONS;
ULTRASOUND;
D O I:
10.1186/s12957-021-02403-2
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background To evaluate the usefulness of surveillance-abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (AB-MRI) for the detection of ipsilateral local tumor recurrence (LTR) in patients who underwent oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) by comparing its diagnostic performance with that of mammography (MG) and ultrasonography (US). Methods The postoperative MG, US, and AB-MRI findings of the ipsilateral breast and pathological results of 324 patients who underwent oncoplastic BCS using ADM were reviewed. The cancer detection rate (CDR), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) for biopsy, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) for each imaging modality were calculated. Results A total of 8 ipsilateral LTRs were diagnosed, and most cancers (87.5%) were stage 0 or 1 (median size of invasive cancer, 1.44 cm; range, 0.7-2 cm). The CDRs of MG, US, MG + US, and AB-MRI were 0.009, 0.012, 0.015, and 0.025 per woman, respectively. Three cancers were detectable on only AB-MRI, and the additional CDR of AB-MRI was 0.010. The sensitivity and specificity of MG, US, MG + US, and AB-MRI were 37.5%, 50%, 62.5%, and 100% and 99.7%, 98.4%, 98.1%, and 97.8%, respectively. The PPVs for biopsy were 75%, 44.4%, 45.5%, and 53.3%, respectively. The AUC was significantly higher for AB-MRI (0.989) than for MG alone (0.686, P = 0.0009), US alone (0.742, P = 0.009), and MG + US (0.803, P = 0.04). A total of 66.7% of cancers visible on only AB-MRI were located at the deep posterior portion of the excision cavity, which might have been missed with MG or MG + US due to masking by the ADM filler. Conclusion AB-MRI can improve the detection of ipsilateral LTR despite postoperative changes caused by ADM fillers compared to conventional MG and US. Patients who undergo BCS with ADM can be candidates for AB-MRI surveillance considering improved cancer detection and high sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文