Closed-Loop Applicability of the Sign-Perturbed Sums Method

被引:0
作者
Csaji, Balazs Csanad [1 ]
Weyert, Erik [2 ]
机构
[1] Hungarian Acad Sci, MTA SZTAKI Inst Comp Sci & Control, Fraunhofer Project Ctr, Kende Utca 13-17, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Engn, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
来源
2015 54TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC) | 2015年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Sign-Perturbed Sums (SPS) is a non-asymptotic system identification method that can construct confidence regions for general linear systems. It works under mild statistical assumptions, such as symmetric and independent noise terms. The SPS confidence region includes the prediction error estimate (PEM) and, for any finite sample and user-chosen confidence probability, it contains the true system parameter with exactly the given probability. Originally, SPS was introduced for open-loop systems, this paper overviews its applicability in closed-loop setups. The three main PEM approaches of closed-loop identification are addressed: direct, indirect and joint input-output, and it is discussed whether SPS can be applied to construct guaranteed finite sample confidence regions around these PEM estimates. Some parametrization issues are also highlighted and, finally, two numerical experiments are presented demonstrating SPS for closed-loop systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1441 / 1446
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1999, SYSTEM IDENTIFICATIO
  • [2] Csáji BC, 2014, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P3352, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2014.7039908
  • [3] Sign-Perturbed Sums: A New System Identification Approach for Constructing Exact Non-Asymptotic Confidence Regions in Linear Regression Models
    Csaji, Balazs Csanad
    Campi, Marco Claudio
    Weyer, Erik
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2015, 63 (01) : 169 - 181
  • [4] Csáji BC, 2012, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P7321, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2012.6425882
  • [5] Closed-loop identification revisited
    Forssell, U
    Ljung, L
    [J]. AUTOMATICA, 1999, 35 (07) : 1215 - 1241
  • [6] Forssell U., 1999, Closed-Loop Identification
  • [7] Comparison of the closed-loop identification methods in terms of the bias distribution
    Karimi, A
    Landau, ID
    [J]. SYSTEMS & CONTROL LETTERS, 1998, 34 (04) : 159 - 167
  • [8] Guaranteed characterization of exact non-asymptotic confidence regions as defined by LSCR and SPS
    Kieffer, Michel
    Walter, Eric
    [J]. AUTOMATICA, 2014, 50 (02) : 507 - 512
  • [9] Perturbed datasets methods for hypothesis testing and structure of corresponding confidence sets
    Kolumban, Sandor
    Vajk, Istvan
    Schoukens, Johan
    [J]. AUTOMATICA, 2015, 51 : 326 - 331
  • [10] Soderstrom T., 1989, SYSTEM IDENTIFICATIO