Pinyin and English Invented Spelling in Chinese-Speaking Students Who Speak English as a Second Language

被引:13
作者
Ding, Yi [1 ]
Liu, Ru-De [2 ]
McBride, Catherine A. [3 ]
Fan, Chung-Hau [4 ]
Xu, Le [5 ]
Wang, Jia [6 ]
机构
[1] Fordham Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Div Psychol & Educ Serv, 113 West 60th St,Lowenstein Room 1008, New York, NY 10023 USA
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Natl Demonstrat Ctr Expt Psychol Educ, Beijing Key Lab Appl Expt Psychol, Inst Dev Psychol,Fac Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Idaho State Univ, Pocatello, ID 83209 USA
[5] Beijing Adm Inst, Beijing Municipal Comm CPC, Party Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Beijing Union Univ, Teachers Coll, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Pinyin invented spelling; Phonological awareness; Tone sandhi; Word stress rules; Chinese Mandarin speaking; 2 WRITING SYSTEMS; PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS; READING ACQUISITION; HONG-KONG; WORD RECOGNITION; SKILLS; CHILDREN; KINDERGARTEN; VOCABULARY; LITERACY;
D O I
10.1007/s10936-018-9585-4
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This study examined pinyin (the official phonetic system that transcribes the lexical tones and pronunciation of Chinese characters) invented spelling and English invented spelling in 72 Mandarin-speaking 6th graders who learned English as their second language. The pinyin invented spelling task measured segmental-level awareness including syllable and phoneme awareness, and suprasegmental-level awareness including lexical tones and tone sandhi in Chinese Mandarin. The English invented spelling task manipulated segmental-level awareness including syllable awareness and phoneme awareness, and suprasegmental-level awareness including word stress. This pinyin task outperformed a traditional phonological awareness task that only measured segmental-level awareness and may have optimal utility to measure unique phonological and linguistic features in Chinese reading. The pinyin invented spelling uniquely explained variance in Chinese conventional spelling and word reading in both languages. The English invented spelling uniquely explained variance in conventional spelling and word reading in both languages. Our findings appear to support the role of phonological activation in Chinese reading. Our experimental linguistic manipulations altered the phonological awareness item difficulties.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1187
页数:25
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   DOES PHONEME AWARENESS TRAINING IN KINDERGARTEN MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN EARLY WORD RECOGNITION AND DEVELOPMENTAL SPELLING [J].
BALL, EW ;
BLACHMAN, BA .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1991, 26 (01) :49-66
[2]  
Bear DR, 1998, READ TEACH, V52, P222
[3]   Bilingualism, language proficiency, and learning to read in two writing systems [J].
Bialystok, E ;
McBride-Chang, C ;
Luk, G .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 97 (04) :580-590
[4]   Bilingualism, biliteracy, and learning to read: Interactions among languages and writing systems [J].
Bialystok, E ;
Luk, G ;
Kwan, E .
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES OF READING, 2005, 9 (01) :43-61
[5]   Developing phonological awareness: Is there a bilingual advantage? [J].
Bialystok, E ;
Majumder, S ;
Martin, MM .
APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2003, 24 (01) :27-44
[6]   The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study [J].
Caravolas, M ;
Hulme, C ;
Snowling, MJ .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2001, 45 (04) :751-774
[7]   Phonological processing in reading Chinese among normally achieving and poor readers [J].
Chan, CKK ;
Siegel, LS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 80 (01) :23-43
[8]   Phonological awareness of bilingual and monolingual Chinese children [J].
Chen, X ;
Anderson, RC ;
Li, WL ;
Hao, ML ;
Wu, XC ;
Shu, H .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 96 (01) :142-151
[9]  
Cheung H., 2003, Reading development in Chinese children, P3
[10]   Phonological processing skills and early reading abilities in Hong Kong Chinese kindergarteners learning to read English as a second language [J].
Chow, BWY ;
McBride-Chang, C ;
Burgess, S .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 97 (01) :81-87