Randomised trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with gallbladder left in situ versus open surgery for common bileduct calculi in high-risk patients

被引:135
作者
Targarona, EM
Ayuso, RMP
Bordas, JM
Ros, E
Pros, I
Martinez, J
Teres, J
Trias, M
机构
[1] UNIV BARCELONA,HOSP CLIN,SERV GEN & DIGEST SURG,BARCELONA,SPAIN
[2] UNIV BARCELONA,HOSP CLIN,GASTROENTEROL SERV,BARCELONA,SPAIN
[3] UNIV BARCELONA,HOSP CLIN,ENDOSCOPY UNIT,BARCELONA,SPAIN
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91413-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Morbidity and mortality after surgical treatment of bileduct stones increase with age and associated diseases. A proposed alternative therapy is endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) with the gallbladder left in situ, and we selected to compare this option with standard open surgery in high-risk patients. Methods 98 patients (mean age 80 years) with symptoms likely to be due to bileduct stones or a recent episode of biliary pancreatitis were randomised to be treated either by open cholecystectomy with operative cholangiography and (if necessary) bileduct exploration (n=48) or by endoscopic sphincterotomy alone (n=50). Findings The procedure was accomplished successfully in 94% of the surgery group and 88% of the ES group, and there were no significant differences in immediate morbidity (23% vs 16%) or mortality (4% vs 6%). During mean follow-up of 17 months biliary symptoms recurred in three surgical patients, none of whom underwent repeat surgery, and in 10 ES patients, seven of whom had biliary surgery. By multivariate regression analysis endoscopic sphincterotomy was an independent predictor of recurrent biliary symptoms (odds ratio 6.9; 95% Cl 1.46 to 32.54). Interpretation In elderly or high-risk patients, surgery is preferable to endoscopic sphincterotomy with the gallbladder left in situ as a definitive treatment for bileduct stones or non-severe biliary pancreatitis.
引用
收藏
页码:926 / 929
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY OF PREOPERATIVE ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY VERSUS SURGERY ALONE FOR COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES [J].
NEOPTOLEMOS, JP ;
CARRLOCKE, DL ;
FOSSARD, DP .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 294 (6570) :470-474
[12]   A MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS OF PREOPERATIVE RISK-FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES - IMPLICATIONS FOR TREATMENT [J].
NEOPTOLEMOS, JP ;
SHAW, DE ;
CARRLOCKE, DL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1989, 209 (02) :157-161
[13]   STUDY OF COMMON BILE-DUCT EXPLORATION AND ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY IN A CONSECUTIVE SERIES OF 438 PATIENTS [J].
NEOPTOLEMOS, JP ;
DAVIDSON, BR ;
SHAW, DE ;
LLOYD, D ;
CARRLOCKE, DL ;
FOSSARD, DP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 74 (10) :916-921
[14]  
PANIS Y, 1995, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V108, pA431
[15]   MANAGEMENT OF BILE-DUCT STONES IN THE ERA OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
PERISSAT, J ;
HUIBREGTSE, K ;
KEANE, FBV ;
RUSSELL, RCG ;
NEOPTOLEMOS, JP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (06) :799-810
[16]   OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES - LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT [J].
PERISSAT, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 1994, 6 (10) :857-863
[17]  
ROTHENBERG RE, 1991, AM SURGEON, V57, P306
[18]   PRECHOLECYSTECTOMY ENDOSCOPIC CHOLANGIOGRAPHY AND STONE REMOVAL IS NOT SUPERIOR TO CHOLECYSTECTOMY, CHOLANGIOGRAPHY, AND COMMON DUCT EXPLORATION [J].
STIEGMANN, GV ;
GOFF, JS ;
MANSOUR, A ;
PEARLMAN, N ;
REVEILLE, RM ;
NORTON, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 163 (02) :227-230
[19]   MANAGEMENT OF CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS IN THE LAPAROSCOPIC ERA [J].
STRASBERG, SM ;
SOPER, NJ .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 109 (01) :320-322
[20]  
TARGARONA EM, 1992, MED CLIN-BARCELONA, V98, P69