Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire

被引:28
作者
Campos, J. A. D. B. [1 ]
Carrascosa, A. C. [2 ]
Maroco, J. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista UNESP, Fac Odontol Araraquara SP, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Paulista UNESP, Fac Ciencias Farmaceut Araraquara SP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Inst Univ, ISPA, Dept Estat, Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Unidade Invest Psicol Saude, Lisbon, Portugal
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
reliability; validity; Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire; temporomandibular joint disorders; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; STATISTICAL-METHODS; EQUIVALENCY; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02276.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ) (Portuguese version). Face and content validity of the Portuguese version were performed. To assess reproducibility of the data gathered with MFIQ, it was applied to 62 individuals who completed the questionnaire on two occasions. Validity and reliability of the data gathered with MFIQ were evaluated in a sample of 249 patients. Construct-related validity was assessed through factorial validity (by means of a confirmatory factor analysis), and convergent and discriminant validities were assessed, respectively, by the average variance extracted (AVE), composite reliability (CC) and bivariate correlations between factors. The internal consistency was estimated by the standardised Cronbachs alpha coefficient (a) and reproducibility by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). All the items of MFIQ showed content validity. Reproducibility was excellent in both the functional capacity dimension (D1) (ICCD1 = 0.895, 95% CI = 0.832 to 0.935) and the feeding dimension (D2) (ICCD2 = 0.825, 95% CI = 0.726 to 0.891). Items 1, 2, 6 and 7 of D1 had factor weights below the desired cut-off (0.5), and overall fit of the original bifactorial structure of the MFIQ was poor [(confirmatory fit index) CFI = 0.850, (goodness of fit index) GFI = 0.781, (root mean square error of approximation) RMSEA = 0.118]. Thus, these items were excluded, and the new, reduced version of the MFIQ showed good fit (CFI = 0.933, GFI = 0.879, RMSEA = 0.099). The convergent validity was adequate (AVE = 0.5, CC = 0.7) for both factors. However, their discriminant validity was low (AVED1 = 0.51 and AVED2 = 0.66 < ?2D1D2 = 0.70). The internal consistency was excellent (aD1 = 0.874; aD2 = 0.918). The Portuguese version of the reduced MFIQ produced data with good validity and reliability.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 383
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] THE SCANDAL OF POOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6924) : 283 - 284
  • [2] Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures
    Beaton, DE
    Bombardier, C
    Guillemin, F
    Ferraz, MB
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) : 3186 - 3191
  • [3] Byrne B.M., 2001, Multivariate applications book series.Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications
  • [4] Chaves TC, 2008, FISIOTER PESQUI, V15, P121
  • [5] Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
  • [6] da Fonseca DM, 1994, RGO (Porto Alegre), V42, P23, DOI DOI 10.1103/PHYSREVA.90.043846
  • [7] De Laat A, 2003, J OROFAC PAIN, V17, P42
  • [8] Drangsholt M., 1999, EPIDEMIOLOGY PAIN, P203
  • [9] Dworkin Samuel F., 1992, Journal of Craniomandibular Disorders, V6, P301
  • [10] USE OF STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS IN THE NEW-ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
    EMERSON, JD
    COLDITZ, GA
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 309 (12) : 709 - 713