Low risk of complications associated with the fenestrated peritoneal catheter used for intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer

被引:16
作者
Black, Destin [1 ]
Levine, Douglas A. [1 ]
Nicoll, Linda [1 ]
Chou, Joanne F. [2 ]
Lasonos, Alexia [2 ]
Brown, Carol L. [1 ]
Sonoda, Yukio [1 ]
Chi, Dennis S. [1 ]
Leitao, Mario M. [1 ]
Abu-Rusturn, Nadeem R. [1 ]
Ferguson, Sarah E. [1 ]
Barakat, Richard R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Gynecol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
intraperitoneal catheter; chemotherapy; ovarian cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.12.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives. We previously reported a 10% rate of catheter complications, including inflow obstruction and infection, using a fenestrated catheter to administer intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. Because of recent reports of higher rates of catheter complications, we performed this study to update our experience with the fenestrated catheter. Methods. We reviewed the medical records of all patients who had a fenestrated catheter placed at our institution from 5/97-5/06. Data were collected regarding patient demographics, surgical procedure, timing of catheter insertion, and reasons for discontinuing IP chemotherapy. Results. We identified 342 patients who had fenestrated catheters placed and for whom follow-up data were available. Nine patients (3%) required discontinuation of chemotherapy due to catheter complications. Three patients experienced catheter infection, 5 patients had inflow obstruction, and 1 patient's port could not be accessed. Seventy-one patients (21%) discontinued IP chemotherapy for reasons unrelated to the catheter. The percentage of patients who completed the intended chemotherapy regimen was similar for patients who underwent a bowel resection (22/30 [73%]) compared to those who had not (226/312 [72%]) (P=1.0). Conclusions. The fenestrated catheter for IP chemotherapy continues to be associated with a low risk of catheter-related complications. The low rate of complications, even in the setting of bowel resection and increase in utilization during upfront chemotherapy, suggest that the fenestrated catheter is still a feasible method for the administration of IP chemotherapy. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 42
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer
    Alberts, DS
    Liu, PY
    Hannigan, EV
    OToole, R
    Williams, SD
    Young, JA
    Franklin, EW
    ClarkePearson, DL
    Malviya, VK
    DuBeshter, B
    Adelson, MD
    Hoskins, WJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (26) : 1950 - 1955
  • [2] Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer
    Armstrong, DK
    Bundy, B
    Wenzel, L
    Huang, HQ
    Baergen, R
    Lele, S
    Copeland, LJ
    Walker, JL
    Burger, RA
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (01) : 34 - 43
  • [3] INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOTHERAPY - ANALYSIS OF COMPLICATIONS WITH AN IMPLANTED SUBCUTANEOUS PORT AND CATHETER SYSTEM
    DAVIDSON, SA
    RUBIN, SC
    MARKMAN, M
    JONES, WB
    HAKES, TB
    REICHMAN, B
    ALMADRONES, L
    CHAPMAN, D
    LEWIS, JL
    HOSKINS, WJ
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1991, 41 (02) : 101 - 106
  • [4] First-line intraperitoneal carboplatin-based chemotherapy for 165 patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma: results of long-term follow-up
    Fujiwara, K
    Sakuragi, N
    Suzuki, S
    Yoshida, N
    Maehata, K
    Nishiya, M
    Koshida, T
    Sawai, H
    Aotani, E
    Kohno, I
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 90 (03) : 637 - 643
  • [5] Intraperitoneal versus intravenous cisplatin in combination with intravenous cyclophosphamide and epidoxorubicin in optimally cytoreduced advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A randomized trial of the Gruppo Oncologico Noud-Ovest
    Gadducci, A
    Carnino, F
    Chiara, S
    Brunetti, I
    Tanganelli, L
    Romanini, A
    Bruzzone, M
    Conte, PF
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2000, 76 (02) : 157 - 162
  • [6] Phase II trial of intraperitoneal cisplatin and mitoxantrone in patients with persistent ovarian cancer
    Husain, A
    Sabbatini, P
    Spriggs, D
    Fennelly, D
    Aghajanian, C
    Barakat, R
    Curtin, J
    Venkatraman, E
    Hoskins, W
    Markman, M
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1999, 73 (01) : 96 - 101
  • [7] Cancer statistics, 2007
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    Siegel, Rebecca
    Ward, Elizabeth
    Murray, Taylor
    Xu, Jiaquan
    Thun, Michael J.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2007, 57 (01) : 43 - 66
  • [8] A COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS VERSUS INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOTHERAPY FOR THE INITIAL TREATMENT OF OVARIAN-CANCER
    KIRMANI, S
    BRALY, PS
    MCCLAY, EF
    SALTZSTEIN, SL
    PLAXE, SC
    KIM, S
    CATES, C
    HOWELL, SB
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1994, 54 (03) : 338 - 344
  • [9] Complications associated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy catheters
    Makhija, S
    Leitao, M
    Sabbatini, P
    Bellin, N
    Almadrones, L
    Leon, L
    Spriggs, DR
    Barakat, R
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 81 (01) : 77 - 81
  • [10] Intraperitoneal chemotherapy of ovarian cancer: A review, with a focus on practical aspects of treatment
    Markman, M
    Walker, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (06) : 988 - 994