Comparative Effectiveness of Pain Management Interventions for Hip Fracture: A Systematic Review

被引:156
作者
Abou-Setta, Ahmed M. [1 ]
Beaupre, Lauren A. [1 ]
Rashiq, Saifee [1 ]
Dryden, Donna M. [1 ]
Hamm, Michele P. [1 ]
Sadowski, Cheryl A. [1 ]
Menon, Matthew R. G. [1 ]
Majumdar, Sumit R. [1 ]
Wilson, Donna M. [1 ]
Karkhaneh, Mohammad [1 ]
Mousavi, Shima S. [1 ]
Wong, Kai [1 ]
Tjosvold, Lisa [1 ]
Jones, C. Allyson [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Pediat, Alberta Res Ctr Hlth Evidence,Univ Alberta Eviden, Edmonton, AB T6G 2J3, Canada
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
FEMORAL NERVE BLOCK; PREOPERATIVE SKIN TRACTION; PSOAS COMPARTMENT BLOCK; PERIOPERATIVE MYOCARDIAL-ISCHEMIA; SPINAL-ANESTHESIA; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; ONSET TIME; DOSE BUPIVACAINE;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-155-4-201108160-00346
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Pain management is integral to the management of hip fracture. Purpose: To review the benefits and harms of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions for managing pain after hip fracture. Data Sources: 25 electronic databases (January 1990 to December 2010), gray literature, trial registries, and reference lists, with no language restrictions. Study Selection: Multiple reviewers independently and in duplicate screened 9357 citations to identify randomized, controlled trials (RCTs); nonrandomized, controlled trials (non-RCTs); and cohort studies of pain management techniques in older adults after acute hip fracture. Data Extraction: Independent, duplicate data extraction and quality assessment were conducted, with discrepancies resolved by consensus or a third reviewer. Data extracted included study characteristics, inclusion and exclusion criteria, participant characteristics, interventions, and outcomes. Data Synthesis: 83 unique studies (64 RCTs, 5 non-RCTs, and 14 cohort studies) were included that addressed nerve blockade (n = 32), spinal anesthesia (n = 30), systemic analgesia (n = 3), traction (n = 11), multimodal pain management (n = 2), neurostimulation (n = 2), rehabilitation (n = 1), and complementary and alternative medicine (n = 2). Overall, moderate evidence suggests that nerve blockades are effective for relieving acute pain and reducing delirium. Low-level evidence suggests that preoperative traction does not reduce acute pain. Evidence was insufficient on the benefits and harms of most interventions, including spinal anesthesia, systemic analgesia, multimodal pain management, acupressure, relaxation therapy, transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation, and physical therapy regimens, in managing acute pain. Limitations: No studies evaluated outcomes of chronic pain or exclusively examined participants from nursing homes or with cognitive impairment. Systemic analgesics (narcotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) were understudied during the search period. Conclusion: Nerve blockade seems to be effective in reducing acute pain after hip fracture. Sparse data preclude firm conclusions about the relative benefits or harms of many other pain management interventions for patients with hip fracture.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / +
页数:18
相关论文
共 115 条
  • [1] Abbey Jennifer, 2004, Int J Palliat Nurs, V10, P6
  • [2] Adams H A, 1990, Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed, V25, P263, DOI 10.1055/s-2007-1001062
  • [3] Alonso Chico A, 2003, Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, V50, P17
  • [4] Postoperative delirium in the older patient
    Amador, LF
    Goodwin, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2005, 200 (05) : 767 - 773
  • [5] PREOPERATIVE SKIN TRACTION FOR FRACTURES OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR - A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE TRIAL
    ANDERSON, GH
    HARPER, WM
    CONNOLLY, CD
    BADHAM, J
    GOODRICH, N
    GREGG, PJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1993, 75 (05): : 794 - 796
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2010, PUBLICADO REV SOC ES
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2003, ACUTE PAIN, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1366-0071(03)00004-4
  • [8] [Anonymous], J BAHRAIN MED SOC
  • [9] [Anonymous], REG ANESTH PAIN M S1
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2006, Journal Europeen Des Urgences, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0993-9857(06)76317-8