Teicoplanin Dosing Strategy for Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus in Korean Patients with Neutropenic Fever

被引:18
作者
Ahn, Byung-Jin [2 ]
Yim, Dong-Seok [3 ]
Lee, Dong-Gun [1 ]
Kwon, Jae-Cheol [1 ]
Kim, Si-Hyun [1 ]
Choi, Su-Mi [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Seoul 137701, South Korea
[2] Dongguk Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Dept Pharmacol, Seoul 137701, South Korea
关键词
Teicoplanin; Staphylococcus aureus; neutropenia; pharmacokinetics; pharmacodynamics; VANCOMYCIN; PHARMACODYNAMICS; PHARMACOKINETICS; GLYCOPEPTIDES; THERAPY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3349/ymj.2011.52.4.616
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The present study was conducted to determine and compare the target attainment rate (TAR) between microorganism-nonspecific (C-trough) and microorganism-specific (AUC(24)/MIC) targets over two weeks of teicoplanin administration according to several dose regimens for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus in Korean patients with neutropenic fever. Materials and Methods: One thousand virtual concentrations were obtained for each dose using the population pharmacokinetic parameters of teicoplanin adopted from a published study. Simulation of 1,000 virtual MICs was performed using the MICs of 78 clinical isolates of S. aureus collected from a hospital in Korea. Thereafter, these simulated MICs were randomly allocated to 1,000 virtual patients in whom the TARs for AUC(24)/MIC >125 [or 345] and C-trough >10 [or 20] mg/L were determined. The relationship of the maintenance dose with the steady-state TAR was predicted with respect to the AUC(24)/MIC >125 [or 345] using logistic analysis. Results: The standard dose regimen of teicoplanin showed TARs of about 70% [or 33%] and 70% [or 20%] at steady-state in cases with AUC(24)/MIC >125 [or 345] and C-trough >10 [or 20] mg/L, respectively. Conclusion: The current standard dose regimen was predicted to be insufficient to adequately treat S. aureus in Korean patients with neutropenic fever. To assure at least an 80% TAR in this population, dose adjustment of teicoplanin should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 623
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[21]   The integrated use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models for the definition of breakpoints [J].
Stass, H ;
Dalhoff, A .
INFECTION, 2005, 33 (Suppl 2) :29-35
[22]   Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Vancomycin versus Teicoplanin: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Svetitsky, Shuli ;
Leibovici, Leonard ;
Paul, Mical .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2009, 53 (10) :4069-4079
[23]   Glycopeptides in clinical development: pharmacological profile and clinical perspectives [J].
Van Bambeke, F .
CURRENT OPINION IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 4 (05) :471-478
[24]   Emergence of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with reduced susceptibility to teicoplanin during therapy [J].
Weinbren, M ;
Struthers, K .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 50 (02) :306-307
[25]   Pharmacokinetic studies of linezolid and teicoplanin in the critically ill [J].
Whitehouse, T ;
Cepeda, JA ;
Shulman, R ;
Aarons, L ;
Nalda-Molina, R ;
Tobin, C ;
MacGowan, A ;
Shaw, S ;
Kibbler, C ;
Singer, M ;
Wilson, APR .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 55 (03) :333-340
[26]   Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin [J].
Wilson, APR .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2000, 39 (03) :167-183