ASSESSMENT OF OSTEOPOROTIC FEMORAL FRACTURE RISK: FINITE ELEMENT METHOD AS A POTENTIAL REPLACEMENT FOR CURRENT CLINICAL TECHNIQUES

被引:2
作者
van den Munckhof, Sven [1 ]
Nikooyan, Ali Asadi [1 ,2 ]
Zadpoor, Amir Abbas [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Mech Maritime & Mat Engn, Dept Biomech Engn, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Integrat Physiol, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
Bone; osteoporosis; fracture; finite element; risk assessment; DXA; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION; COHESIVE ZONE MODEL; HIP AXIS LENGTH; PROXIMAL FEMUR; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; TRABECULAR BONE; CORTICAL BONE; OLDER WOMEN; VERTEBRAL MICROSTRUCTURE;
D O I
10.1142/S0219519415300033
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Femoral fracture risk prediction is a necessary step preceding effective pharmacological intervention or pre-operative planning. Current clinical methods for fracture risk prediction rely on 2D imaging methods and have limited predictive value. Researchers are therefore trying to find improved methods for fracture prediction. During last few decades, many studies have focused on integration of 3D imaging techniques and the finite element (FE) method to improve the accuracy of fracture assessment techniques. In this paper, we review the recent advances in FE and other techniques for predicting the risk of femoral fractures. Based on a number of selected studies, the different steps that are involved in generation of patient-specific FE models are reviewed with particular emphasis on the fracture criteria. The inaccuracies that might arise due to the imperfections of the involved steps are also discussed. It is concluded that compared to image- and geometry-based techniques, FE is a more promising approach for prediction of fracture loads. However, certain technological advancements in FE modeling protocols are required before FE modeling can be recruited in clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 134 条
[21]   Variations in three-dimensional cancellous bone architecture of the proximal femur in female hip fractures and in controls [J].
Ciarelli, TE ;
Fyhrie, DP ;
Schaffler, MB ;
Goldstein, SA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2000, 15 (01) :32-40
[22]   Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA [J].
Cody, DD ;
Gross, GJ ;
Hou, FJ ;
Spencer, HJ ;
Goldstein, SA ;
Fyhrie, DP .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 32 (10) :1013-1020
[23]  
Cook R. D., 2007, Concepts and applications of finite element analysis
[24]   Digital image correlation analysis of interfacial debonding properties and fracture behavior in concrete [J].
Corr, David ;
Accardi, Matteo ;
Graham-Brady, Lori ;
Shah, Surendra .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2007, 74 (1-2) :109-121
[25]   EFFECTS OF LOADING RATE ON STRENGTH OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR [J].
COURTNEY, AC ;
WACHTEL, EF ;
MYERS, ER ;
HAYES, WC .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 55 (01) :53-58
[26]   INFLUENCE OF THIGH MUSCLES ON THE AXIAL STRAINS IN A PROXIMAL FEMUR DURING EARLY STANCE IN GAIT [J].
CRISTOFOLINI, L ;
VICECONTI, M ;
TONI, A ;
GIUNTI, A .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 28 (05) :617-624
[27]   Mechanical testing of bones: the positive synergy of finite-element models and in vitro experiments [J].
Cristofolini, Luca ;
Schileo, Enrico ;
Juszczyk, Mateusz ;
Taddei, Fulvia ;
Martelli, Saulo ;
Viceconti, Marco .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2010, 368 (1920) :2725-2763
[28]   In vitro replication of spontaneous fractures of the proximal human femur [J].
Cristofolinial, Luca ;
Juszczyk, Mateusz ;
Martelli, Saulo ;
Taddei, Fulvia ;
Viceconti, Marco .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2007, 40 (13) :2837-2845
[29]   A nonlinear QCT-based finite element model validation study for the human femur tested in two configurations in vitro [J].
Dall'Ara, E. ;
Luisier, B. ;
Schmidt, R. ;
Kainberger, F. ;
Zysset, P. ;
Pahr, D. .
BONE, 2013, 52 (01) :27-38
[30]   The assessment of the risk of fracture in femora with metastatic lesions Comparing case-specific finite element analyses with predictions by clinical experts [J].
Derikx, L. C. ;
van Aken, J. B. ;
Janssen, D. ;
Snyers, A. ;
Van der Linden, Y. M. ;
Verdonschot, N. ;
Tanck, E. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2012, 94B (08) :1135-1142