Using Thinkalouds to Understand Rule Learning and Cognitive Control Mechanisms Within an Intelligent Tutoring System

被引:1
作者
Unal, Deniz Sonmez [1 ]
Arrington, Catherine M. [2 ]
Solovey, Erin [3 ]
Walker, Erin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Lehigh Univ, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
[3] Worcester Polytech Inst, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
来源
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION (AIED 2020), PT I | 2020年 / 12163卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cognitive control; Rule learning; Problem solving; Intelligent tutoring systems; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-52237-7_40
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Cognitive control and rule learning are two important mechanisms that explain how goals influence behavior and how knowledge is acquired. These mechanisms are studied heavily in cognitive science literature within highly controlled tasks to understand human cognition. Although they are closely linked to the student behaviors that are often studied within intelligent tutoring systems (ITS), their direct effects on learning have not been explored. Understanding these underlying cognitive mechanisms of beneficial and harmful student behaviors can provide deeper insight into detecting such behaviors and improve predictive models of student learning. In this paper, we present a thinkaloud study where we asked students to narrate their thought processes while solving probability problems in ASSISTments. Students are randomly assigned to one of two conditions that are designed to induce the two modes of cognitive control based on the Dual Mechanisms of Control framework. We also observe how the students go through the phases of rule learning as defined in a rule learning paradigm. We discuss the effects of these different mechanisms on learning, and how the information they provide can be used in student modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 511
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor [J].
Aleven, VAWMM ;
Koedinger, KR .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2002, 26 (02) :147-179
[2]   CNTRICS Final Task Selection: Working Memory [J].
Barch, Deanna M. ;
Berman, Marc G. ;
Engle, Randy ;
Jones, Jessica Hurdelbrink ;
Jonides, John ;
MacDonald, Angus, III ;
Nee, Derek Evan ;
Redick, Thomas S. ;
Sponheim, Scott R. .
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2009, 35 (01) :136-152
[3]   Conflict monitoring and cognitive control [J].
Botvinick, MM ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (03) :624-652
[4]   The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework [J].
Braver, Todd S. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (02) :106-113
[5]   Flexible neural mechanisms of cognitive control within human prefrontal cortex [J].
Braver, Todd S. ;
Paxton, Jessica L. ;
Locke, Hannah S. ;
Barch, Deanna M. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (18) :7351-7356
[6]   Bizarre responses, rule detection and frontal lobe lesions [J].
Burgess, PW ;
Shallice, T .
CORTEX, 1996, 32 (02) :241-259
[7]   Dissociable roles of medial and lateral PFC in rule learning [J].
Cao, Bihua ;
Li, Wei ;
Li, Fuhong ;
Li, Hong .
BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2016, 6 (11)
[8]   Pupillometric and behavioral markers of a developmental shift in the temporal dynamics of cognitive control [J].
Chatham, Christopher H. ;
Frank, Michael J. ;
Munakata, Yuko .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (14) :5529-5533
[9]  
Chi MTH, 2000, ADV INSTR P, V5, P161
[10]   Mechanisms of Rule Acquisition and Rule Following in Inductive Reasoning [J].
Crescentini, Cristiano ;
Seyed-Allaei, Shima ;
De Pisapia, Nicola ;
Jovicich, Jorge ;
Amati, Daniele ;
Shallice, Tim .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 31 (21) :7763-7774