What creativity isn't: The presumptions of instrumental and individual justifications for creativity in education

被引:19
作者
Gibson, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Bath Spa Univ, Sch Educ, Bath BA2 9BN, Avon, England
关键词
creativity; education; instrumentalism; romantic individualism;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00288.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Creativity is a popular but heterogeneous word in educational parlance these days. By looking at a selection of recent discourses that refer to creativity to sustain their positions, the paper suggests that two key themes emerge, both with questionable assumptions. Romantic individualists would return us to a naive bygone age of authentic self-expression, while politicians and economists would use the term instrumentally by binding it to the future needs of the workforce without questioning substantive issues. Cultural theories of creativity indicate pathways out.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 167
页数:20
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1974, Critique of Instrumental Reason
[2]  
[Anonymous], DID I HEAR YOU WRITE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1969, UTILITARIANISM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1989, ED DRAMATIC ART
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1973, GRUNDRISSE INTRO CRI
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1999, All our futures: Creativity, culture and education
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1972, KNOWLEDGE HUMAN INTE
[8]  
[Anonymous], EMILE
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1984, D HEATHCOTE COLLECTE
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1967, DEV DRAMA