Relative Differences between Nonlinear and Equivalent-Linear 1-D Site Response Analyses

被引:91
作者
Kim, Byungmin [1 ]
Hashash, Youssef M. A. [2 ]
Stewart, Jonathan P. [3 ]
Rathje, Ellen M. [4 ]
Harmon, Joseph A. [2 ]
Musgrove, Michael I. [2 ]
Campbell, Kenneth W. [5 ]
Silva, Walter J. [6 ]
机构
[1] Risk Management Solut Inc, Newark, CA 94560 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[5] EQECAT Inc, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
[6] Pacific Engn & Anal Inc, El Cerrito, CA 94530 USA
关键词
EASTERN NORTH-AMERICA; GROUND MOTIONS; EARTHQUAKE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1193/051215EQS068M
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study investigates the conditions for which one-dimensional (1-D) nonlinear (NL) site response analysis results are distinct from equivalent-linear (EL) results and provides guidance for predicting when differences are large enough to be of practical significance. Relative differences in spectral accelerations and Fourier amplitudes computed from NL and EL analyses are assessed for a range of site conditions and for suites of input motions appropriate for active crustal and stable continental regions. Among several considered parameters, EL/NL differences are most clearly dependent on shear strain index (I-gamma), defined as the ratio of input motion peak velocity to time-averaged shear-wave velocity in the top 30 m of the soil profile. For small I-gamma (generally under 0.03%), EL and NL results are practically identical, whereas at larger strains, differences can be significant for frequencies >0.3 Hz. Frequency-dependent I-gamma, values are recommended for conditions above which NL analyses are preferred to EL.
引用
收藏
页码:1845 / 1865
页数:21
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]  
Matasovic N., 2012, NCHRP428 TRANSP RES
[22]  
MATASOVIC N, 1993, THESIS
[23]  
McGuire RK., 2001, TECHNICAL BASIS REVI
[24]   Damping formulation for nonlinear 1D site response analyses [J].
Phillips, Camilo ;
Hashash, Youssef M. A. .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2009, 29 (07) :1143-1158
[25]  
Pyke Robert., 2000, TESS: A computer program for nonlinear ground response analyses
[26]  
Rathje E. M., 2011, 5 INT C EARTHQ GEOT
[27]   Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions [J].
Rathje, EM ;
Abrahamson, NA ;
Bray, JD .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1998, 124 (02) :150-159
[28]  
Romero S.M., 2005, Ground motion amplification in the Upper Mississippi Embayment
[29]  
Seed H. B., 1969, ASCE J SOIL MECH FDN, V95
[30]   Development of site-specific design ground motions in Western and Eastern North America [J].
Silva, W ;
Costantino, C .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2002, 22 (9-12) :755-764