Power of QTL detection using association tests with family controls

被引:4
作者
Hernández-Sánchez, J
Haley, CS
Visscher, PM
机构
[1] Roslin Inst, Roslin EH25 9PS, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Cell Anim & Populat Biol, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
TDT; association; power; robustness; linkage disequilibrium;
D O I
10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201042
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The power of testing for a population-wide association between a biallelic quantitative trait locus and a linked biallelic marker locus is predicted both empirically and deterministically for several tests. The tests were based on the analysis of variance ( ANOVA) and on a number of transmission disequilibrium tests (TDT). Deterministic power predictions made use of family information, and were functions of population parameters including linkage disequilibrium, allele frequencies, and recombination rate. Deterministic power predictions were very close to the empirical power from simulations in all scenarios considered in this study. The different TDTs had very similar power, intermediate between one-way and nested ANOVAs. One-way ANOVA was the only test that was not robust against spurious disequilibrium. Our general framework for predicting power deterministically can be used to predict power in other association tests. Deterministic power calculations are a powerful tool for researchers to plan and evaluate experiments and obviate the need for elaborate simulation studies.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 827
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Effect of Winsorization on Power and Type 1 Error of Variance Components and Related Methods of QTL Detection [J].
Sanjay Shete ;
T. Mark Beasley ;
Carol J. Etzel ;
José R. Fernández ;
Jianfang Chen ;
David B. Allison ;
Christopher I. Amos .
Behavior Genetics, 2004, 34 :153-159
[32]   Statistical challenges for genome-wide association studies of suicidality using family data [J].
Lasky-Su, J. ;
Lange, C. .
EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 25 (05) :307-309
[33]   On the statistical properties of family-based association tests in datasets containing both pedigrees and unrelated case-control samples [J].
Hiekkalinna, Tero ;
Goering, Harald H. H. ;
Lambert, Brian ;
Weiss, Kenneth M. ;
Norrgrann, Petri ;
Schaeffer, Alejandro A. ;
Terwilliger, Joseph D. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2012, 20 (02) :217-223
[34]   Genetic association tests: A method for the joint analysis of family and case-control data [J].
Gray-Mcguire C. ;
Bochud M. ;
Goodloe R. ;
Elston R.C. .
Human Genomics, 4 (1) :2-20
[35]   Combining unrelated family studies to improve the power of genetic association test [J].
Cheng, K. F. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (02) :311-325
[36]   Allele sharing and allelic association I: Sib pair tests with increased power [J].
Lazzeroni, LC .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 22 (04) :328-344
[37]   A novel approach for small sample size family-based association studies: sequential tests [J].
Ilk, Ozlem ;
Rajabli, Farid ;
Dungul, Dilay Ciglidag ;
Ozdag, Hilal ;
Ilk, Hakki Gokhan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2011, 19 (08) :915-920
[38]   On dichotomizing phenotypes in family-based association tests:: Quantitative phenotypes are not always the optimal choice [J].
Fardo, David ;
Celedon, Juan C. ;
Raby, Benjamin A. ;
Weiss, Scott T. ;
Lange, Christoph .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 31 (05) :376-382
[39]   The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests [J].
Liu, WL ;
Zhao, W ;
Chase, GA .
HUMAN HEREDITY, 2006, 61 (01) :31-44
[40]   SPS: A Simulation Tool for Calculating Power of Set-Based Genetic Association Tests [J].
Li, Jiang ;
Sham, Pak Chung ;
Song, Youqiang ;
Li, Miaoxin .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 39 (05) :395-397