Impact of pulse oximetry screening to detect congenital heart defects: 5 years' experience in a UK regional neonatal unit

被引:11
作者
Singh, Yogen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Si Emma [2 ]
机构
[1] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Paediat Neonatol & Paediat Cardiol, NICU, Box 402,Biomed Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Box 402,Biomed Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[3] Loma Linda Univ, Sch Med, Loma Linda, CA 92350 USA
关键词
Pulse oximetry screening (POS); Congenital heart defect (CHD); Critical congenital heart defect (CCHD); Screening; New-born infant; PERFUSION INDEX; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; OXYGEN-SATURATION; NEWBORN-INFANTS; DISEASE; DIAGNOSIS; MORTALITY; TRENDS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1007/s00431-021-04275-w
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Pulse oximetry screening (POS) has been shown to be an effective, non-invasive investigation that can detect up to 50-70% of previously undiagnosed congenital heart defects (CHDs). The aims of this study were to assess the accuracy of POS in detection of CHDs and its impact on clinical practice. All eligible newborn infants born between 1 Jan 2015 and 31 Dec 2019 in a busy regional neonatal unit were included in this prospective observational study. A positive POS was classified as two separate measurements of oxygen saturation < 95%, or a difference of > 2% between pre- and post-ductal circulations. Overall, 23,614 infants had documented POS results. One hundred eighty nine (0.8%) infants had a true positive result: 6 had critical CHDs, 9 serious or significant CHDs, and a further 156/189 (83%) infants had significant non-cardiac conditions. Forty-three infants who had a normal POS were later diagnosed with the following categories of CHDs post-hospital discharge: 1 critical, 15 serious, 20 significant and 7 non-significant CHDs. POS sensitivity for detection of critical CHD was 85.7%, whereas sensitivity was only 33% for detection of major CHDs (critical and serious) needing surgery during infancy; specificity was 99.3%. Conclusion: Pulse oximetry screening showed moderate to high sensitivity in detection of undiagnosed critical CHDs; however, it failed to detect two-third of major CHDs. Our study further emphasises the significance of adopting routine POS to detect critical CHDs in the clinical practice. However, it also highlights the need to develop new, innovative methods, such as perfusion index, to detect other major CHDs missed by current screening tools. What is Known: center dot Pulse oximetry screening is cost effective, acceptable, easy to perform and has moderate sensitivity and high specificity in detection of critical congenital heart defects. center dot Pulse oximetry screening has been implemented many countries including USA for detection of critical congenital heart defects, but it is not currently recommended by the UK National Screening Committee. What is New: center dot To our knowledge, this is the first study describing postnatal detection and presentation of all the infants with congenital heart defects over a period of 5 years, including those not detected on the pulse oximetry screening, on the clinical practice. center dot It emphasises that further research required to detect critical congenital heart defects and other major CHDs which can be missed on the screening tools currently employed in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 821
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Association of US State Implementation of Newborn Screening Policies for Critical Congenital Heart Disease With Early Infant Cardiac Deaths
    Abouk, Rahi
    Grosse, Scott D.
    Ailes, Elizabeth C.
    Oster, Matthew E.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (21): : 2111 - 2118
  • [2] DEATH IN INFANCY FROM UNRECOGNIZED CONGENITAL HEART-DISEASE
    ABUHARB, M
    HEY, E
    WREN, C
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1994, 71 (01) : 3 - 7
  • [3] Estimated Number of Infants Detected and Missed by Critical Congenital Heart Defect Screening
    Ailes, Elizabeth C.
    Gilboa, Suzanne M.
    Honein, Margaret A.
    Oster, Matthew E.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2015, 135 (06) : 1000 - 1008
  • [4] Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart disease: a comparative study of cohorts over 11 years
    Banait, Nishant
    Ward-Platt, Martin
    Abu-Harb, Majd
    Wyllie, Jonathan
    Miller, Nicola
    Harigopal, Sundeep
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (12) : 2064 - 2068
  • [5] Bernier Pierre-Luc, 2010, Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu, V13, P26, DOI 10.1053/j.pcsu.2010.02.005
  • [6] Delayed diagnosis of congenital heart disease worsens preoperative condition and outcome of surgery in neonates
    Brown, K. L.
    Ridout, D. A.
    Hoskote, A.
    Verhulst, L.
    Ricci, M.
    Bull, C.
    [J]. HEART, 2006, 92 (09) : 1298 - 1302
  • [7] Newborn pulse oximetry screening in the UK: a 2020 survey
    Brown, Sebastian
    Liyanage, Shehan
    Mikrou, Paraskevi
    Singh, Anju
    Ewer, Andrew K.
    [J]. LANCET, 2020, 396 (10255) : 881 - 881
  • [8] Pulse Oximetry Screening Has Not Changed Timing of Diagnosis or Mortality of Critical Congenital Heart Disease
    Campbell, Matthew J.
    Quarshie, William O.
    Faerber, Jennifer
    Goldberg, David J.
    Mascio, Christopher E.
    Blinder, Joshua J.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 41 (05) : 899 - 904
  • [9] Impact of pulse oximetry screening on the detection of duct dependent congenital heart disease: a Swedish prospective screening study in 39 821 newborns
    Granelli, Anne de-Wahl
    Wennergren, Margareta
    Sandberg, Kenneth
    Mellander, Mats
    Bejlum, Carina
    Inganas, Leif
    Eriksson, Monica
    Segerdahl, Niklas
    Agren, Annelie
    Ekman-Joelsson, Britt-Marie
    Sunnegardh, Jan
    Verdicchio, Mario
    Ostman-Smith, Ingegerd
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 : 145 - 148
  • [10] A novel system to collect dual pulse oximetry data for critical congenital heart disease screening research
    Doshi, Kavish
    Rehm, Gregory B.
    Vadlaputi, Pranjali
    Lai, Zhengfeng
    Lakshminrusimha, Satyan
    Chuah, Chen-Nee
    Siefkes, Heather M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2021, 5 (01)