Analyzing uncertainties involved in estimating collapse risk with and without considering uncertainty probability distribution parameters

被引:5
作者
Bayari, Mohammad Amin [1 ]
Shabakhty, Naser [2 ]
Abadi, Esmaeel Izadi Zaman [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Najafabad Branch, Najafabad 8514143131, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Tehran 16844, Iran
关键词
uncertainty analysis; collapse response; artificial neural network; response surface method; FRAGILITY ASSESSMENT; RELIABILITY; CURVE;
D O I
10.1007/s11803-021-2068-x
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In the present study, modified Ibarra, Medina and Krawinkler moment-rotation parameters are used for modeling the uncertainties in concrete moment frame structures. Correlations of model parameters in a component and between two structural components were considered to analyze these uncertainties. In the first step, the structural collapse responses were obtained by producing 281 samples for the uncertainties using the Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) method, considering the probability distribution of the uncertainties and performing incremental dynamic analyses. In the second step, 281 new samples were produced for the uncertainties by the central composite design (CCD) method without considering the probability distribution of the uncertainties and calculating the structural collapse responses. Then, using the response surface method (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) for the two simulation modes, structural collapse responses were predicted. The results indicated that the collapse responses at levels of 0 to 100% obtained from the two simulations have a high correlation coefficient of 98%. This suggests that random variables can be simulated without considering the probability distribution of uncertainties, by performing uncertainty analysis to determine structural collapse responses.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 116
页数:16
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Anderson J., 1995, An Introduction to Neural Networks, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/3905.001.0001
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, P695 FEMA
[3]  
Baker J. W., 2006, VECTOR VALUED GROUND
[4]   A comprehensive collapse fragility assessment of moment resisting steel frames considering various sources of uncertainties [J].
Beheshti-Aval, S. B. ;
Khojastehfar, E. ;
Noori, M. ;
Zolfaghari, M. R. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2016, 43 (02) :118-131
[5]   Collapse period of degrading SDOF systems [J].
Borekci, M. ;
Kircil, M. S. ;
Ekiz, I .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION, 2014, 13 (04) :681-694
[6]   A comparison of approximate response functions in structural reliability analysis [J].
Bucher, Christian ;
Most, Thomas .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2008, 23 (2-3) :154-163
[7]   Response Surface with random factors for seismic fragility of reinforced concrete frames [J].
Buratti, N. ;
Ferracuti, B. ;
Savoia, M. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2010, 32 (01) :42-51
[8]   Seismic fragility assessment of optimally designed steel moment frames [J].
Fattahi, Fayegh ;
Gholizadeh, Saeed .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 179 :37-51
[9]   Reliability-based optimum seismic design of RC frames by a metamodel and metaheuristics [J].
Gholizadeh, Saeed ;
Aligholizadeh, Vahid .
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2019, 28 (01)