Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, single-port and percutaneous hysterectomy: Comparison of perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive approaches in gynecologic surgery

被引:58
作者
Rossitto, C. [1 ]
Cianci, S. [1 ]
Alletti, S. Gueli [1 ]
Perrone, E. [1 ]
Pizzacalla, S. [1 ]
Scambia, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Sacred Hearth, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Rome, Italy
关键词
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS); Hysterectomy; LESS; Percutaneous instruments; Mini-laparoscopy; Laparoscopy; Gynecology; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; METAANALYSIS; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.026
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: During the last decade endoscopic surgical procedures have been constantly evolving. The latest innovation in ultra-minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is the percutaneous technology (Percuvance (TM) Percutaneous Surgical System (PSS), Teleflex Inc., USA). We compared surgical outcome of hysterectomy, in a retrospective cohort study using the most recent MIS techniques as single-site (LESS) surgery, 3 mm laparoscopy (MiniLPS) and percutaneous system (PSS) with standard laparoscopy (LPS). Study design: This is a matched retrospective cohort study. Endometrial Hyperplasia/Early stage endometrial cancer or benign pathology were the indication for surgery. Data of laparoscopic hysterectomies performed between May 2013 and April 2016 using PSS, LPS, MiniLPS, and LESS were collected and compared. Results: The characteristics of each group were similar. The median Operative time (OT) was significantly longer in LESS compared to all other groups (120 min [range 55-165] in LESS, 91 min [range 60-180] in MiniLPS, 70 min [range 55-230] in LPS and 65 [range 40-180] in PSS; p = 0.0001). No significant differences among the 4 groups were observed in terms of estimated blood loss, conversion to laparoscopy or laparotomy, and intra e post-operative complications. Statistically significant differences were recorded in median VAS 24h (2 [range 0-3] in PSS, 2 [range 0-3] in MiniLPS, 3 [range 2-5] in LESS and 2 [range 1-5] in LPS; p = 0.0001). The average time of discharge was (1 day [range 1-3] in PSS, 1 day [range 1-2] in MiniLPS, 1 days [range 1-2] in LESS and 1 day [range 1-3] in LPS; p = 0.99). Conclusions: Data show that the effort to minimize the impact of surgical invasiveness can be feasible and could improve the advantages, not only in terms of aesthetic outcomes, even if the differences among the endoscopic approaches have not a relevant clinical impact. The technology innovations like PSS maintain the same triangulation between instruments as standard LPS with an evident decrease of the invasiveness thanks to reduced instruments size, even if the lack of suitability of bipolar energy, that require a multifunction instrument, remain a limit of these instruments. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 129
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Minimizing minimally invasive surgery: Current status of the single-port roboticsurgery in Urology [J].
Garisto, J. ;
Bertolo, R. ;
Reese, S. W. ;
Bove, P. ;
Kaouk, J. .
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2021, 45 (05) :345-352
[22]   Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Hysterectomy by Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) versus Single-Port Access (SPA) Surgery [J].
Noh, Joseph J. ;
Kim, Myeong-Seon ;
Kang, Jun-Hyeok ;
Jung, Ji-Hee ;
Chang, Chi-Son ;
Jeon, Jungeun ;
Kim, Tae-Joong .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (06)
[23]   Association of gum chewing with early gastrointestinal recovery in single-port laparoscopic gynecologic surgery [J].
Yin, Ya-Nan ;
Xie, Hong ;
Jiang, Ni-Jie ;
Dai, Li .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 16 (03) :66-74
[24]   Comparison Between Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Performed Using Single-Port Approach [J].
Ohwaki, Akiko ;
Takada, Kyohei ;
Kobayashi, Arata ;
Ito, Mayuko ;
Ichikawa, Ryoko ;
Miyamura, Hironori ;
Nishizawa, Haruki .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2025, 18 (01)
[25]   Comparison of Single-port Robotic Surgery Using the Da Vinci SP Surgical System and Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Indications [J].
Miyamura, Hironori ;
Mizuno, Yusuke ;
Ohwaki, Akiko ;
Ito, Mayuko ;
Nishio, Eiji ;
Nishizawa, Haruki .
GYNECOLOGY AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY-GMIT, 2025, 14 (03) :229-233
[26]   Postoperative Outcomes after Single-port Laparoscopic Removal of Adnexal Masses in Patients Referred to Gynecologic Oncology at a Large Academic Center [J].
Moulton, Laura J. ;
Jernigan, Amelia M. ;
Michener, Chad M. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 24 (07) :1137-1145
[27]   Single-port versus conventional laparoscopic salpingectomy in tubal pregnancy: a comparison of surgical outcomes [J].
Yoon, Bo Sung ;
Park, Hyun ;
Seong, Seok Ju ;
Park, Chong Taik ;
Jun, Hye Sun ;
Kim, In Hyun .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2011, 159 (01) :190-193
[28]   Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Single-Port Access Laparoscopic and Single-Site Robotic Surgery in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Single-Center Cohort Study [J].
Hyun, Suk Hwan ;
Yoo, Ji Geun ;
Jung, Ye Won ;
Shin, Won Kyo ;
Song, Soo Youn ;
Choi, Jae Sung ;
Ko, Young Bok ;
Lee, Mina ;
Kang, Byung Hun ;
Park, Mia ;
Kim, You Jin ;
Lee, Geon Woo ;
Lee, Kyong-No ;
Yoo, Heon Jong .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (03)
[29]   Robot-assisted laparoscopic single-site hysterectomy: our experience and multicentric comparison with single-port laparoscopy [J].
Cela, Vito ;
Marrucci, Elena ;
Angioni, Stefano ;
Freschi, Letizia .
MINERVA GINECOLOGICA, 2018, 70 (05) :621-628
[30]   Surgical Outcomes of Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm [J].
Yang, In Jun ;
Seo, Minseol ;
Oh, Heung-Kwon ;
Lee, Jeehye ;
Suh, Jung Wook ;
Kim, Duck-Woo ;
Kang, Sung-Bum .
ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2021, 37 (04) :239-243