Management Power, R&D and Enterprise Performance: Moderating Effect Based on Management Competence

被引:14
作者
Wang, Fan [1 ,2 ]
Quan, Junqing [1 ]
Ni, Juan [3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Accounting, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Audit Off PR China, Audit Sci Inst, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Publ Finance & Taxat, Wuhan 430073, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF CHINESE HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT | 2021年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
Management power; R&D; Enterprise performance;
D O I
10.47297/wspchrmWSP2040-800501.20211201
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper studies the relationship between management power, R&D and enterprise performance by selecting A-share listed companies in Shenzhen and Shanghai from 2007 to 2016. Design/methodology/approach - OLS regression Findings - The results show that management power is positively correlated with enterprise performance. There is a significant positive correlation between management power and R&D. That is, the more power the management has, the more likely it is to invest in venture capital and the more decision-making power it has, and the more attention it pays to achieve long-term development through R&D and innovation. R&D has a partially mediating effect between management power and enterprise performance. In addition, this paper also verifies that since R&D still has an impact on firm performance in the subsequent period, this mediating effect still holds in the subsequent period. Management ability has a positive moderating effect on the mediating effect of management power on firm performance through R&D. The moderating path is the first half of the mediating effect, that is, the stronger the management ability is, the more attention the management with power attaches to improving enterprise performance through increasing R&D. Originality/value - This article warms that management power is positively correlated with enterprise performance
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 17
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Study on Performance Management of Enterprise R&D Staff
    Cai, Houqing
    Qin, Xincai
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, INNOVATION MANAGEMENT AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOL 3, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 563 - 566
  • [2] The transform of R&D management pattern in enterprise group
    Qi, ZY
    Yu, T
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2002 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, VOLS I AND II, 2002, : 1982 - 1985
  • [3] A Study of Knowledge Management in the Enterprise R&D Process
    Zhou Wenyong
    Chen Yuan
    2009 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 1917 - 1921
  • [4] KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM OF R&D PROJECT BASED ON AHP METHOD
    Liu, Renqing
    Zhang, Lingling
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTER THEORY AND ENGINEERING ( ICACTE 2011), 2011, : 659 - 662
  • [5] Enterprises' internationalization, R&D investment and enterprise performance
    Fu, Yanyu
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 67
  • [6] High-tech Enterprise R&D Integrated Financial Management Mechanism and Operation
    Qi Junye
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2011 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM - ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEM AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, 2011, : 119 - 126
  • [7] A Study on the Impact of Digital Transformation on Enterprise Performance: The Mediating Role of Dual Innovation and the Moderating Role of Management Power
    Wang, Xiyu
    Yan, Ying
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (21)
  • [8] The Moderating Effect of Group Diversification on R&D Spillovers
    Young, Chaur-Shiuh
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2008, 46 : 31 - 65
  • [9] R&D portfolio management practices in Brazilian electric power utilities
    Yamakawa, Eduardo K.
    Sousa-Zomer, Thayla T.
    Cauchick-Miguel, Paulo A.
    Killen, Catherine P.
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2018, 25 (06) : 1641 - 1655
  • [10] R&D to operations transition management
    Brah, SA
    Hunsucker, JL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2000, 20 (01) : 31 - 49