Dosimetric verification of brain and head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment using EDR2 films and 2D ion chamber array matrix

被引:8
作者
Varatharaj, C. [1 ]
Ravikumar, M. [1 ]
Sathiyan, S. [1 ]
Supe, Sanjay S. [1 ]
Vivek, T. R. [2 ]
Manikandan, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kidwai Mem Inst Oncol, Dept Radiat Phys, Bangalore 560029, Karnataka, India
[2] Manipal Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Bangalore 560017, Karnataka, India
关键词
EDR2film; gamma index; I'matriXX; intensity-modulated radiation therapy; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; IONIZATION-CHAMBER; DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; RADIOTHERAPY; IMPLEMENTATION; DELIVERY; PROSTATE;
D O I
10.4103/0973-1482.65233
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The evaluation of the agreement between measured and calculated dose plays an essential role in the quality assurance (QA) procedures of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Aim: The purpose of this study is to compare performances of the two dosimetric systems (EDR2 and I'matriXX) in the verification of the dose distributions calculated by the TPS for brain and head and neck dynamic IMRT cases. Materials and Methods: The comparison of cumulative fluence by using Kodak extended dose rate (EDR2) and I'matriXX detectors has been done for the evaluation of 10 brain, 10 head and neck IMRT cases treated with 6 MV beams. The parameter used to assess the quality of dose calculation is the gamma-index (gamma-index) method. The acceptance limits for gamma calculation we have used are 3% and 3 mm respectively for dose agreement and distance to agreement parameters. Statistical analyses were performed by using the paired, two-tailed Student t-test, and P<0.01 is kept as a threshold for the significance level. Results: The qualitative dose distribution comparison was performed using composite dose distribution in the measurement plane and profiles along various axes for TPS vs. EDR2 film and TPS Vs I'matriXX. The quantitative analysis between the calculated and measured dose distribution was evaluated using DTA and gamma-index. The percentage of pixels matching with the set DTA and gamma values are comparable for both with EDR2 film and I'matriXX array detectors. Statistically there was no significant variation observed between EDR2 film and I'matriXX in terms of the mean percentage of pixel passing gamma for brain cases (98.77 +/- 1.03 vs 97.62 +/- 1.66, P = 0.0218) and for head and neck cases (97.39 +/- 2.13 vs 97.17 +/- 1.52%, P = 0.7404). Conclusion: Due to simplicity and fast evaluation process of array detectors, it can be routinely used in busy departments without compromising the measurement accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 184
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Agazaryan Nzhde, 2003, J Appl Clin Med Phys, V4, P40, DOI 10.1120/1.1525243
[2]  
Bedford James L, 2004, J Appl Clin Med Phys, V5, P1, DOI 10.1120/jacmp.2020.25271
[3]   An intercomparison between film dosimetry and diode matrix for IMRT quality assurance [J].
Buonamici, F. Banci ;
Compagnucci, A. ;
Marrazzo, L. ;
Russo, S. ;
Bucciolini, M. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (04) :1372-1379
[4]   Planning, delivery, and quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using dynamic multileaf collimator: A strategy for large-scale implementation for the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate [J].
Burman, C ;
Chui, CS ;
Kutcher, G ;
Leibel, S ;
Zelefsky, M ;
LoSasso, T ;
Spirou, S ;
Wu, QW ;
Yang, J ;
Stein, J ;
Mohan, R ;
Fuks, Z ;
Ling, CC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (04) :863-873
[5]   A comparison of three stereotactic radiotherapy techniques; arcs vs. noncoplanar fixed fields vs. intensity modulation [J].
Cardinale, RM ;
Benedict, SH ;
Wu, QW ;
Zwicker, RD ;
Gaballa, HE ;
Mohan, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (02) :431-436
[6]  
Chao KSC, 2000, INT J CANCER, V90, P92, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000420)90:2<92::AID-IJC5>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-9
[8]   A quantitative evaluation of IMRT dose distributions: refinement and clinical assessment of the gamma evaluation [J].
Depuydt, T ;
Van Esch, A ;
Huyskens, DP .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2002, 62 (03) :309-319
[9]   TOLERANCE OF NORMAL TISSUE TO THERAPEUTIC IRRADIATION [J].
EMAMI, B ;
LYMAN, J ;
BROWN, A ;
COIA, L ;
GOITEIN, M ;
MUNZENRIDER, JE ;
SHANK, B ;
SOLIN, LJ ;
WESSON, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01) :109-122
[10]   A software toes for the quantitative evaluation of 3D dose calculation algorithms [J].
Harms, WB ;
Low, DA ;
Wong, JW ;
Purdy, JA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (10) :1830-1836