Voice and trust in parliamentary representation

被引:8
作者
Dunn, Kris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Dept Polit, Exeter EX4 4RJ, Devon, England
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Procedural fairness; Electoral systems; Proportionality; Political trust; Voice; Representation; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; POLITICAL TRUST; ELECTORAL OUTCOMES; FAIRNESS; NUMBER; INSTITUTIONS; GOVERNMENT; PARTIES; LAWS; DISPROPORTIONALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.electstud.2012.01.006
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In both social and political matters, individuals trust those they believe will treat them fairly. Individuals in democracies have little objection to abiding by policies instituted by parties they did not vote for because the system by which the parliament is formed is considered fair. However, even among democracies, some electoral systems are fairer than others. It stands to reason that trust in parliament is affected by the perceived fairness of the electoral system. This research demonstrates that actual or perceived provision of voice in parliamentary representation does increase individual trust in parliament. Systems designed with the intent to provide fair representation and those that provide the illusion of fair representation produce higher levels of trust in parliament. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 405
页数:13
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems [J].
Anderson, CJ ;
Guillory, CA .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1997, 91 (01) :66-81
[2]   Winning, losing and political trust in America [J].
Anderson, CJ ;
LoTempio, AJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 32 :335-351
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata, DOI DOI 10.1093/GERONI/IGZ038.1816
[4]   How elections change the way citizens view the political system: Campaigns, media effects and electoral outcomes in comparative perspective [J].
Banducci, SA ;
Karp, JA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 33 :443-467
[5]   Perceptions of fairness and support for proportional representation [J].
Banducci, SA ;
Karp, JA .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 1999, 21 (03) :217-238
[6]  
Barker Fiona., 2001, MIXED MEMBER ELECTOR, P297
[7]   New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions [J].
Beck, T ;
Clarke, G ;
Groff, A ;
Keefer, P ;
Walsh, P .
WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 15 (01) :165-176
[8]   Electoral institutions and popular confidence in electoral processes: A cross-national analysis [J].
Birch, Sarah .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2008, 27 (02) :305-320
[9]   What determines people's fairness judgments? Identification and outcomes influence procedural justice evaluations under uncertainty [J].
Blader, Steven L. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 43 (06) :986-994
[10]   THE PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT OF ELECTORAL LAWS - MEASURING DUVERGER ELUSIVE FACTOR [J].
BLAIS, A ;
CARTY, RK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1991, 21 :79-93