A multicenter mixed-effects model for inference and prediction of 72-h return visits to the emergency department for adult patients with trauma-related diagnoses

被引:5
作者
Yaghmaei, Ehsan [1 ,2 ]
Ehwerhemuepha, Louis [1 ,2 ]
Feaster, William [1 ]
Gibbs, David [1 ]
Rakovski, Cyril [2 ]
机构
[1] CHOC Childrens, Orange, CA 92868 USA
[2] Chapman Univ, Schmid Coll Sci & Technol, Orange, CA 92866 USA
关键词
Emergency department; Return visits; Trauma; Adult medicine; TRENDS; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-020-01863-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Emergency department (ED) return visits within 72 h may be a sign of poor quality of care and entail unnecessary use of healthcare resources. In this study, we compare the performance of two leading statistical and machine learning classification algorithms, and we use the best performing approach to identify novel risk factors of ED return visits. Methods We analyzed 3.2 million ED encounters with at least one diagnosis under "injury, poisoning and certain other consequences of external causes" and "external causes of morbidity." These encounters included patients 18 years or older from across 128 emergency room facilities in the USA. For each encounter, we calculated the 72-h ED return status and retrieved 57 features from demographics, diagnoses, procedures, and medications administered during the process of administration of medical care. We implemented a mixed-effects model to assess the effects of the covariates while accounting for the hierarchical structure of the data. Additionally, we investigated the predictive accuracy of the extreme gradient boosting tree ensemble approach and compared the performance of the two methods. Results The mixed-effects model indicates that certain blunt force and non-blunt trauma inflates the risk of a return visit. Notably, patients with trauma to the head and patients with burns and corrosions have elevated risks. This is in addition to 11 other classes of both blunt force and non-blunt force traumas. In addition, prior healthcare resource utilization, patients who have had one or more prior return visits within the last 6 months, prior ED visits, and the number of hospitalizations within the 6 months are associated with increased risk of returning to the ED after discharge. On the one hand, the area under the receiver characteristic curve (AUROC) of the mixed-effects model was 0.710 (0.707, 0.712). On the other hand, the gradient boosting tree ensemble had a lower AUROC of 0.698 CI (0.696, 0.700) on the independent test model. Conclusions The proposed mixed-effects model achieved the highest known AUC and resulted in the identification of novel risk factors. The model outperformed one of the leading machine learning ensemble classifiers, the extreme gradient boosting tree in terms of model performance. The risk factors we identified can assist emergency departments to decrease the number of unplanned return visits within 72 h.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] Trends and Characteristics of US Emergency Department Visits, 1997-2007
    Tang, Ning
    Stein, John
    Hsia, Renee Y.
    Maselli, Judith H.
    Gonzales, Ralph
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 304 (06): : 664 - 670
  • [32] The Apache Software Foundation, SPARK PYTH PROGR GUI
  • [33] Emergency department overcrowding in the United States: an emerging threat to patient safety and public health
    Trzeciak, S
    Rivers, EP
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2003, 20 (05) : 402 - 405
  • [34] SHORT-TERM UNSCHEDULED RETURN VISITS OF ADULT PATIENTS TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    Verelst, Sandra
    Pierloot, Sarah
    Desruelles, Didier
    Gillet, Jean-Bernard
    Bergs, Jochen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 47 (02) : 131 - 139
  • [35] UNPLANNED EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT REVISITS WITHIN 72 HOURS TO A SECONDARY TEACHING REFERRAL HOSPITAL IN TAIWAN
    Wu, Chiu-Lung
    Wang, Fa-Tsai
    Chiang, Yao-Chiu
    Chiu, Yuan-Fa
    Lin, Teong-Giap
    Fu, Lian-Fong
    Tsai, Tsung-Lung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (04) : 512 - 517