Prognostic influence of hepatic margin after resection of colorectal liver metastasis: role of modern preoperative chemotherapy

被引:22
作者
Makowiec, Frank [1 ,2 ]
Bronsert, Peter [2 ,3 ]
Klock, Andrea [1 ]
Hopt, Ulrich T. [1 ]
Neeff, Hannes P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Dept Surg, Hugstetter Str 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Hugstetter Str 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Freiburg, Inst Pathol, Hugstetter Str 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
Colorectal liver metastasis; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Hepatic resection; Resection margin; Survival; SURGICAL MARGIN; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; R1; RESECTION; SURVIVAL; CANCER; SURGERY; ERA; DETERMINANT; RECURRENCE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-017-2916-3
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Modern chemotherapy (CTX) increases survival in stage IV colorectal cancer. In colorectal liver metastases (CLM), neoadjuvant (neo) CTX may increase resectability and improve survival. Due to widespread use of CTX in CLM, recent studies assessed the role of the hepatic margin after CTX, with conflicting results. We evaluated the outcome after resection of CLM in relation to CTX and hepatic resection status. Since 2000, 334 patients with first hepatic resection for isolated CLM were analyzed. Thirty-two percent had neoadjuvant chemotherapy (targeted therapy in 42%). Sixty-eight percent never had CTX before hepatectomy or longer than 6 months before resection. The results were gained by analysis of our prospective database. Positive hepatic margins occurred in 8% (independent of neoCTx). Patients after neoCTX had higher numbers of CLM (p < 0.01) and a longer duration of surgery (p < 0.03). After hepatectomy, 5-year survival was 45% and correlated strongly with the margin status (47% in R-0 and 21% in R-1; p < 0.001). Survival also correlated with margin status in the subgroups with neoCTX (p < 0.01) or without neoCTx (p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis of the entire group, hepatic margin status (RR 3.2; p < 0.001) and age > 65 years (RR 1.6; p < 0.01) were associated with poorer survival. In the subgroup of patients after neoCTX (n = 106), only the resection margin was an independent predictor of survival (p < 0.001). In patients with isolated colorectal liver metastases undergoing resection, the hepatic margin status was the strongest independent prognostic factor. This effect was also present after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for CLM.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 78
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Adam R, 2001, ANN SURG ONCOL, V8, P347
[2]   The Oncosurgery Approach to Managing Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: A Multidisciplinary International Consensus [J].
Adam, Rene ;
De Gramont, Aimery ;
Figueras, Joan ;
Guthrie, Ashley ;
Kokudo, Norihiro ;
Kunstlinger, Francis ;
Loyer, Evelyne ;
Poston, Graeme ;
Rougier, Philippe ;
Rubbia-Brandt, Laura ;
Sobrero, Alberto ;
Tabernero, Josep ;
Teh, Catherine ;
Van Cutsem, Eric .
ONCOLOGIST, 2012, 17 (10) :1225-1239
[3]   Margin Status Remains an Important Determinant of Survival After Surgical Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Modern Chemotherapy [J].
Andreou, Andreas ;
Aloia, Thomas A. ;
Brouquet, Antoine ;
Dickson, Paxton V. ;
Zimmitti, Giuseppe ;
Maru, Dipen M. ;
Kopetz, Scott ;
Loyer, Evelyne M. ;
Curley, Steven A. ;
Abdalla, Eddie K. ;
Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (06) :1079-1088
[4]   Outcome of Microscopic Incomplete Resection (R1) of Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy [J].
Ayez, Ninos ;
Lalmahomed, Zarina S. ;
Eggermont, Alexander M. M. ;
Ijzermans, Jan N. M. ;
de Jonge, Jeroen ;
van Montfort, Kees ;
Verhoef, Cornelis .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (05) :1618-1627
[5]   Size of surgical margin does not influence recurrence rates after curative liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases [J].
Bodingbauer, M. ;
Tamandl, D. ;
Schmid, K. ;
Plank, C. ;
Schimai, W. ;
Gruenberger, T. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (09) :1133-1138
[6]   Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Resectable Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastasis; an International Multi-Center Data Analysis Using Livermetsurvey [J].
Bonney, Glenn K. ;
Coldham, Chris ;
Adam, Rene ;
Kaiser, Gernot ;
Barroso, Eduardo ;
Capussotti, Lorenzo ;
Laurent, Christophe ;
Verhoef, Cees ;
Nuzzo, Gennaro ;
Elias, Dominique ;
Lapointe, Real ;
Hubert, Catherine ;
Lopez-Ben, Santiago ;
Krawczyk, Marek ;
Mirza, Darius F. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 111 (06) :716-724
[7]   Surgical margin in hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis - A critical and improvable determinant of outcome [J].
Cady, B ;
Jenkins, RL ;
Steele, GD ;
Lewis, WD ;
Stone, MD ;
McDermott, WV ;
Jessup, JM ;
Bothe, A ;
Lalor, P ;
Lovett, EJ ;
Lavin, P ;
Linehan, DC .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 227 (04) :566-571
[8]   FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the open-label, phase 3 TRIBE study [J].
Cremolini, Chiara ;
Loupakis, Fotios ;
Antoniotti, Carlotta ;
Lupi, Cristiana ;
Sensi, Elisa ;
Lonardi, Sara ;
Mezi, Silvia ;
Tomasello, Gianluca ;
Ronzoni, Monica ;
Zaniboni, Alberto ;
Tonini, Giuseppe ;
Carlomagno, Chiara ;
Allegrini, Giacomo ;
Chiara, Silvana ;
D'Amico, Mauro ;
Granetto, Cristina ;
Cazzaniga, Marina ;
Boni, Luca ;
Fontanini, Gabriella ;
Falcone, Alfredo .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (13) :1306-1315
[9]   R1 Resection by Necessity for Colorectal Liver Metastases Is It Still a Contraindication to Surgery? Discussions [J].
Choti, Michael A. ;
Blumgart, Leslie H. ;
Greene, Frederick L. ;
Clary, Bryan M. ;
Adam, Rene .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 248 (04) :636-637
[10]   DETERMINANTS OF SURVIVAL IN LIVER RESECTION FOR COLORECTAL SECONDARIES [J].
EKBERG, H ;
TRANBERG, KG ;
ANDERSSON, R ;
LUNDSTEDT, C ;
HAGERSTRAND, I ;
RANSTAM, J ;
BENGMARK, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 73 (09) :727-731